Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]OG 164 關於propose...

[問題]OG 164 關於propose...

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]OG 164 關於propose...

文章nature » 2004-12-09 17:03

164. The commission proposed that funding for the park's development, which could be open to the public early next year. is obtained through a local bond issue.



(A)that funding for the park's development, which could be open to the public early next year, is

(B)that funding for development of the park, which could be open to the public early next year, be

(C)funding for the development of the park, perhaps open to the public early next year, to be

(D)funds for the park's development, perhaps open to the public early next year, be

(E)development funding for the park, which could be open to the public early next year, is to be

Choice B is best. Choice A attaches the relative clause which could be open ... to the noun development, when, in fact, it is the park that could be open. Choice C omits that, the object of proposed that is needed to introduce the clause describing the proposal. C also uses to be unidiomatically where be is correct: the commission proposed [that] funding ... to be obtained is wrong. Choice D incorrectly uses perhaps open to

請問..關於c的解釋...我有點疑惑
上課中抄的筆記是
propose+that S 原形V
或N to do
那為什麼OG的解釋是不行這樣用呢? 請幫忙一下囉..謝謝...

 
nature
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 38
註冊時間: 2004-11-01 22:55
來自: 想出國的台灣人

文章agk99 » 2004-12-09 17:17

注意解釋講C的兩段,第一段講的是that 子句 的觀念
第二段則是假設語氣的用法,要用be
agk99
超級版主
超級版主
 
文章: 3109
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 22:12
來自: Shenzhen, China

文章 » 2004-12-09 18:48

........ 不好意思.

大哥可能筆誤了

這應該不是假設法

propose 是意志動詞 後面省略了 (should)

所以 才 用 原型 be
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章nature » 2004-12-09 19:58

sorry....沒解釋清楚我的問題
我了解你們說的關於propose+that 省略should + 原形v的用法
我不了解的是propose不是也可以+N +to v嗎?
如果將c的答案視為這種形式...為什麼不行呢?..是因為funding要改成the funding嗎?...還是根本上就不能使用這種句型呢? 麻煩了...不好意思...
nature
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 38
註冊時間: 2004-11-01 22:55
來自: 想出國的台灣人

文章agk99 » 2004-12-09 20:42

魚 \$m[1]:........ 不好意思.

大哥可能筆誤了

這應該不是假設法

propose 是意志動詞 後面省略了 (should)

所以 才 用 原型 be


我手邊的資料不多了,但查到一個,是莫老師的專題講義第23頁,你說的並沒錯,是什麼意志動詞,但這也是假設語氣

至於所謂的propose Sb to do sth....我印象中沒有,要再看看
agk99
超級版主
超級版主
 
文章: 3109
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 22:12
來自: Shenzhen, China

文章 » 2004-12-09 21:34

nature \$m[1]:sorry....沒解釋清楚我的問題
我了解你們說的關於propose+that 省略should + 原形v的用法
我不了解的是propose不是也可以+N +to v嗎?
如果將c的答案視為這種形式...為什麼不行呢?..是因為funding要改成the funding嗎?...還是根本上就不能使用這種句型呢? 麻煩了...不好意思...


it seems that you misunderstand the explanation .

as what you assert , propose +N +to v is right , however ,

in C , i can't find out the N but a clause . it' s the reason why . :)
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章訪客 » 2004-12-09 23:25

我個人認為ETS很喜歡在porpose後面接that..
這題我認為最大的考點再考邏輯錯誤
which修飾前面的名詞,department不能夠open,公園才行
訪客
 


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 18 位訪客