[討論] 一個 NYT 的句子, with 修飾的問題

[dibert8]

在 New York Times 看到這一句 (Unsold Homes Tie Down Would-Be Transplants, April 3, 2008)
With homes changing hands easily in a booming market, interstate migration reached 2.2 million people in 2006, excluding the effects of Hurricane Katrina.

1. 這個 with 的結構在 GMAT 大概不會對;正確選項會用子句.
2. with homes..., interstate migrantion... => migration 不會有房子;對於房子,和 migration 也扯不上關係.

這樣如何? With homes that changing hands are easy in a booming market, inerstate migrants increased in number to 2.2 million in 2006, excluding the effects of Hurricane Katrina.

[Huang Hsin-Yi]

在 New York Times 看到這一句 (Unsold Homes Tie Down Would-Be Transplants, April 3, 2008)
With homes changing hands easily in a booming market, interstate migration reached 2.2 million people in 2006, excluding the effects of Hurricane Katrina.

直接修飾homes---在繁榮市場中很好脫手的房子,這樣寫挺好的呀!!

longman:with:having, possessing, or carrying something
那些有著在繁榮市場中很好脫手的房子的內部移民人口在2006年達到2.2百萬...........


1. 這個 with 的結構在 GMAT 大概不會對;正確選項會用子句.
2. with homes..., interstate migrantion... => migration 不會有房子;對於房子,和 migration 也扯不上關係.

這樣如何? With homes that changing hands are easy in a booming market,
我個人覺得這樣很wordy

inerstate migrants increased in number to 2.2 million in 2006, excluding the effects of Hurricane Katrina.