[問題] OG171

[evelight]

171. In 1527 King Henry VIII sought to have his marriage to Queen
Catherine annulled so as to marry Anne Boleyn.

(A) so as to marry
(B) and so could be married to
(C) to be married to
(D) so that he could marry
(E) in order that he would marry

1. 在OG解釋裡，A選項的錯誤是does not specify who is to marry Anne.
為什麼在主詞只有亨利八世的情況下用so as to marry還會句意不清呢？

2. 關於E選項，OG說E uses an appropriate conjunction, inorder that,
the verb form would marry is unidiomatic and illogical (might marry would be better).
為什麼might比would好？我覺得是一樣不好 (汗)

[agk99]

ETS 不喜歡用so as to，在眾多同類型題目中，只有OG88題出現一次答案選so... as to V，該題選項中也包括so ...that...，但該選項時態表示錯誤，所以勉強選so... as to

這裡就得區分so as to 與so that 的差別，OG認為，so as to V後面所接的動作，必須由主句的主詞來完成，也就是句子前後執行動作的人要一致，但so...that ...則沒有這種限制，主句的主詞和後面施加動作的人可以不一致。

就以OG171來說，亨利八世想要和她太太離婚，再和安小姐結婚，乍看之下好像是前後主詞、作動作的人都該是一致，但事實上，have his marriage annulled，肯定是由其他人（估計是指英國教皇）來完成，但英國教皇怎可能是後面要和安小姐結婚的人呢？

進一步來說，have sb/sth Ved就好像是　I have my hair cut, 誰剪的頭髮，肯定是理髮師而不是你本人嘛，碰到這種情況，避開so..as to，多選so... that...就不會有歧義了。

至於E選項，我想我解釋得不好，就不說了，由其他XDJM來補充吧

[evelight]

謝謝akg的詳細解說，茅塞頓開呀！
這樣第一點就完全懂了~~謝謝謝謝~~~~

[DARY]

ETS 不喜歡用so as to，在眾多同類型題目中，只有OG88題出現一次答案選so... as to V，該題選項中也包括so ...that...，但該選項時態表示錯誤，所以勉強選so... as to

這裡就得區分so as to 與so that 的差別，OG認為，so as to V後面所接的動作，必須由主句的主詞來完成，也就是句子前後執行動作的人要一致，但so...that ...則沒有這種限制，主句的主詞和後面施加動作的人可以不一致。

就以OG171來說，亨利八世想要和她太太離婚，再和安小姐結婚，乍看之下好像是前後主詞、作動作的人都該是一致，但事實上，have his marriage annulled，肯定是由其他人（估計是指英國教皇）來完成，但英國教皇怎可能是後面要和安小姐結婚的人呢？

進一步來說，have sb/sth Ved就好像是　I have my hair cut, 誰剪的頭髮，肯定是理髮師而不是你本人嘛，碰到這種情況，避開so..as to，多選so... that...就不會有歧義了。

至於E選項，我想我解釋得不好，就不說了，由其他XDJM來補充吧

Henry想要離婚，是為了"將要"和Ann結婚=>would

Henry想要離婚，是為了"能"和Ann結婚=>could

Henry想要離婚，是為了"可以"和Ann結婚=>might

would could might是will could may的過去式，應該沒有含假設的語氣

這是爛招....不知還有沒有更好的解釋

[christina]

請問,在(B)and so could be married to
OG解釋B substitutes an illogical coordinate predicate for the needed purpose clause; because the annulment had not yet been granted, Henry could not remarry.
不懂B的句意是有"無效宣告"已經獲准的意思

請各位大大幫忙解惑,謝謝!

[dawn]

請問,在(B)and so could be married to
OG解釋B substitutes an illogical coordinate predicate for the needed purpose clause; because the annulment had not yet been granted, Henry could not remarry.
不懂B的句意是有"無效宣告"已經獲准的意思

請各位大大幫忙解惑,謝謝!

嗯，我的理解是這樣的，因為他用了and
使得句子有了因果關係的味道

King Henry VIII企圖使他和Queen Catherine的婚姻無效，而後他就可以娶Anne Boleyn.

這句句子不合理的地方在於邏輯出了問題，我舉例說明。
我企圖使我的AT成績得高分，而後我就可以申請好一點的學校。
重點是：我想辦法使我的AT高分沒有用，一定要AT真的考高分，才可以申請好一點的學校，否則如果邏輯合理的話，就變成我想辦法使我的AT高分，而AT就真的會高分了。(如果能這樣就好了 )

所以這裡應該用so that來表目的比較好

我企圖使我的AT成績得高分是為了可以申請好一點的學校。

[cheyen]

從OG在67、88、171都是關於so as to 和so that的題型

OG67

Congress is debating a bill requiring certain employers probide workers with unpaid leave so as to care for sick or newborn children.

A.provide workers with unpaid leave so as to

B.to provide workers with unpaid leave so as to

C.provide workers with unpaid leave in order that they

D.to provide workers with unpaid leave so that they can

E.provide workers with unpaid leave and

ans:D

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=7757


88. The Emperor Augustus, it appears, commissioned an idealized sculpture portrait, the features of which are so unrealistic as to constitute what one scholar calls an "artificial face."

(A)so unrealistic as to constitute

(B)so unrealistic they constituted

(C)so unrealistic that they have constituted

(D)unrealistic enough so that they constitute

(E)unrealistic enough so as to constitute

ans:A

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=3012


171. In 1527 King Henry VIII sought to have his marriage to Queen Catherine annulled so as to marry Anne Boleyn.

(A) so as to marry

(B) and so could be married to

(C) to be married to

(D) so that he could marry

(E) in order that he would marry

ans:D



平常在這站上得到不少資訊、受不不少幫忙

也付出一點小東西，微不足道

:laugh 剛好唸到貼在一起

沒在這做筆記啦

匯整功夫待加強^^

但把連結show出來

看到這題可以直接點出來複習

有誤請指教 :smile

[CarrieLee789]

在OG11th 36.當中也有這題
在E的選項當中，ETS說In order that is followed by may or might;

莫老師是不是有解釋過in order that的用法啊？
我有點印象，但不是很確定
可不可以請有印象的人回覆一下以下規則是否正確？


老師是不是說may or might表可能性
in order that ... he may/might ....
如此...所以他有可能可以....

用would的話
in order that ... he would...
如此...所以他將...
這樣解釋不通，所以in order that 後面必須用may/might ，而不可以用would

請問這樣解釋正確嗎？

[joyce0519]

是地
我的筆記也是這樣超的,老師還有說could/can也可以
只是may/might較佳

[greecechii]

想請問在C選項裡,OG的解釋說The infinitive must be preceded by a conjunction(in order),但是in order to不是可以省略為to嗎?
謝謝~~

[dibert8]

in order to 是介係詞片語,不是連接詞. 推測 OG 的意思比較像是:主詞不同需要連接詞來表達適當的主詞.
(C) 有另外一個缺陷:被動少選.

[tristan]

回應很久以前的前輩christina ^^"
轉自CD
關於B答案解釋的討論串

在B中“SO”应表示前半句动作实现的结果，但实际上动作并未实现，只是SOUGHT而已，所以SO的用法不当