Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]OG73

[問題]OG73

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]OG73

文章chocolatier » 2005-07-07 18:31

想請問..
73.The British Admiralty and the War Office met in March 1892 to consider a possible Russian attempt to seize Constantinople and how they would have to act militarily to deal with them.
(A) how they would have to act militarily to deal with them
(B) how to deal with them if military action would be necessary
(C) what would be necessary militarily for dealing with such an event
(D) what military action would be necessary in order to deal with such an event
(E) the necessity of what kind of military action in order to take for dealing with it
不懂為什麼畫線部份不能解釋為:The British Admiralty and War Office當主詞,how "they"的they就有先行詞可代,句意解釋成"他們要如何在軍事上行動及處理..."?

謝謝大家 :smile
chocolatier
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 61
註冊時間: 2005-04-29 20:00

Re: [問題]OG73

文章維尼 » 2005-07-07 19:43

chocolatier \$m[1]:想請問..
73.The British Admiralty and the War Office met in March 1892 to consider a possible Russian attempt to seize Constantinople and how they would have to act militarily to deal with them.
(A) how they would have to act militarily to deal with them
(B) how to deal with them if military action would be necessary
(C) what would be necessary militarily for dealing with such an event
(D) what military action would be necessary in order to deal with such an event
(E) the necessity of what kind of military action in order to take for dealing with it
不懂為什麼畫線部份不能解釋為:The British Admiralty and War Office當主詞,how "they"的they就有先行詞可代,句意解釋成"他們要如何在軍事上行動及處理..."?

謝謝大家 :smile


這邊的 they 是可以解釋成你的說法
但是 deal with them 就變得很奇怪啦
所以A不能選 :)
MBA Class of 2009, UCLA Anderson School of Management

With this faith, we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day. -- "I Have a Dream", Martin Luther King, Jr.
頭像
維尼
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1194
註冊時間: 2005-02-21 17:41

文章chocolatier » 2005-07-07 20:15

謝謝你,維尼 :smile
只是我會一直解讀成我的想法(A和W當主詞)
所以壓根兒不會再往別的選項找,因為別的選項意思就完全不同了
再者(D)中我看到action就想到莫老師說的act->action改變句意
我就更加不會選,繼續往我的解讀去走..
以上就是我的思路囉...
sigh~~
chocolatier
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 61
註冊時間: 2005-04-29 20:00

文章christina » 2005-07-07 20:31

chocolatier \$m[1]:謝謝你,維尼 :smile
只是我會一直解讀成我的想法(A和W當主詞)
所以壓根兒不會再往別的選項找,因為別的選項意思就完全不同了
再者(D)中我看到action就想到莫老師說的act->action改變句意
我就更加不會選,繼續往我的解讀去走..
以上就是我的思路囉...
sigh~~

看一下OG的解釋有助於理解喔,
Og中並沒有指出they指代錯,只有說them 無可指代,
這一題的思路,Og也有說明是consider X and Y
X:名詞a possible Russian attempt ...去找另一個名詞Y,所以就是D了,賓果!!
christina
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 195
註冊時間: 2004-11-04 19:48

文章sharonstone » 2005-07-07 22:19

stone: 喂...你看看這題...你選那一個
william:喔...hmm...唉呀...這題是難題呢!......c or d 吧...我猜是d
stone: 是喔...你答對了說...為什麼這題是難題呢?
william:............
stone: 是莫老大說這題是難題嗎?
william:...................
stone: -.-.........
Do~ Do Si Do Si So~
La Mi~ Mi So La Re~
Si Do~ Do Si Do Re.Si.So~ Do Si La_ Do Si La_ Do Si La .......
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/sharonstone
頭像
sharonstone
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 811
註冊時間: 2004-11-21 15:28

文章chocolatier » 2005-07-08 11:22

謝謝Christina的提醒 :laugh
sharonstone您的言語有點抽象..小的看不懂..還是謝謝您 :smile
chocolatier
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 61
註冊時間: 2005-04-29 20:00

文章agk99 » 2005-07-08 13:02

christina \$m[1]:
chocolatier \$m[1]:謝謝你,維尼 :smile
只是我會一直解讀成我的想法(A和W當主詞)
所以壓根兒不會再往別的選項找,因為別的選項意思就完全不同了
再者(D)中我看到action就想到莫老師說的act->action改變句意
我就更加不會選,繼續往我的解讀去走..
以上就是我的思路囉...
sigh~~

看一下OG的解釋有助於理解喔,
Og中並沒有指出they指代錯,只有說them 無可指代,
這一題的思路,Og也有說明是consider X and Y
X:名詞a possible Russian attempt ...去找另一個名詞Y,所以就是D了,賓果!!


其實看到and用平衡法解,就差不多了
what必是引導名詞子句或名詞片語
how則是形容詞子句或片語
至於act - action就改變句意
我想你儘快忘掉吧
太危險的招式
agk99
超級版主
超級版主
 
文章: 3109
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 22:12
來自: Shenzhen, China

文章Calvin » 2005-07-08 13:30

唉…不要中老莫的毒太深啦!

不是我不尊敬莫大俠,實在是要用一些簡單的規則技巧來應付SC,實在是太危險啦!

套句哈佛魔人Ti 的名言,OG SC的解釋,根本是考AT的聖經!看個十遍都不為過

原波加油
有一些無聲的話語,只有尋夢的人,彼此才聽得懂
頭像
Calvin
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1155
註冊時間: 2004-12-28 02:46

文章維尼 » 2005-07-08 14:21

agk99 \$m[1]:
christina \$m[1]:
chocolatier \$m[1]:謝謝你,維尼 :smile
只是我會一直解讀成我的想法(A和W當主詞)
所以壓根兒不會再往別的選項找,因為別的選項意思就完全不同了
再者(D)中我看到action就想到莫老師說的act->action改變句意
我就更加不會選,繼續往我的解讀去走..
以上就是我的思路囉...
sigh~~

看一下OG的解釋有助於理解喔,
Og中並沒有指出they指代錯,只有說them 無可指代,
這一題的思路,Og也有說明是consider X and Y
X:名詞a possible Russian attempt ...去找另一個名詞Y,所以就是D了,賓果!!


其實看到and用平衡法解,就差不多了
what必是引導名詞子句或名詞片語
how則是形容詞子句或片語
至於act - action就改變句意
我想你儘快忘掉吧
太危險的招式


OG裡面的解釋也常說 distort the meaning
問題是在於我們對於句意是不是瞭解 :P
莫老師的解題思路第一步就是 看完句子 略知句意
所以閱讀不好實在是很吃虧 *-)

的確 動詞 跟 名詞 要表達的句意是有些許不同的
所以老師的一些招術是可以做為參考
ex: adj + N 不等於 adv + v
提醒自己注意句意是不是被轉換了
但是只要句意是對的
我覺得就別拘泥在 "原題動詞 答案名詞 少選" 的技巧囉
MBA Class of 2009, UCLA Anderson School of Management

With this faith, we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day. -- "I Have a Dream", Martin Luther King, Jr.
頭像
維尼
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1194
註冊時間: 2005-02-21 17:41

文章knowledgegap » 2005-09-27 15:25

我看不懂C的解釋, 為什麼necessary militarily is awkward and vague??
頭像
knowledgegap
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 11
註冊時間: 2005-09-10 23:30

文章維尼 » 2005-09-27 16:00

knowledgegap \$m[1]:我看不懂C的解釋, 為什麼necessary militarily is awkward and vague??



比較答案 what military action would be necessary
他的確沒有明確指出 軍事行動
MBA Class of 2009, UCLA Anderson School of Management

With this faith, we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day. -- "I Have a Dream", Martin Luther King, Jr.
頭像
維尼
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1194
註冊時間: 2005-02-21 17:41


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 15 位訪客