OG(11TH)Diagnostic Test Verbal 49

[hungji]

DTV 49

As an actress and, more importantly, as a teacher of acting, Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, who trained several generations of actors including Marlon Brando and Robert De Niro.

A. Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, who trained several generations of actors including

B. Stella Adler, one of the most influential artists in the American theater, trained several generations of actors who include

C. Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, training several generations of actors whose ranks included

D. one of the most influential artists in the American theater was Stella Adler, who trained several generations of actors including

E. one of the most influential artists in the American theater, Stella Adler, trained several generations of actors whose ranks included



答案 C (可否請教何解? ranks?)

[蛙蛙]

請問一下 A為什麼錯??

還有 C 中的 ......in the American theater, training several generations of actors whose ranks included .....

training 在形容什麼呢??

我怎麼覺得是在形容theater 信心崩潰中.....

請大家教一下吧 謝謝

[freshmanduke]

a跟C主要差別在與
A中who可一形容 one of the most influential artists 中 one 也就是stella本人 但也可形容 the most influential artists 這些人 造成指代不清
不曉得訓練馬蘭白蘭度 跟勞勃狄尼洛 這些人的是 stella本人 還是當代有名的那群artists
C training 明白指出 就是stella本人訓練馬蘭白蘭度 跟勞勃狄尼洛 這些人

[蛙蛙]

謝謝 杜克新鮮人大大 的解釋 我懂了

[bakekab]

新版的og 小弟還沒看過 一直在看舊版的

不過還是提供一下小弟的看法
A. Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, who trained several generations of actors including 在 x of y 的結構當中 x 是主要的 , who 結構 鮮少能夠指代 y ,
小弟想的是 several generations of actors 這裡使用 including 是不是比較不適當呢?? 因為是在形容 generations 阿 而不是actors 所以用 including 有點怪怪的 答案c 沒有這個奇怪的地方 使用的漫恰當的 是說 several generations 的ranks 包含.......

可以在討論看看

[zuckzhc]

新版的og 小弟還沒看過 一直在看舊版的

不過還是提供一下小弟的看法
A. Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, who trained several generations of actors including 在 x of y 的結構當中 x 是主要的 , who 結構 鮮少能夠指代 y ,
小弟想的是 several generations of actors 這裡使用 including 是不是比較不適當呢?? 因為是在形容 generations 阿 而不是actors 所以用 including 有點怪怪的 答案c 沒有這個奇怪的地方 使用的漫恰當的 是說 several generations 的ranks 包含.......

可以在討論看看

whose ranks including arlon Brando and Robert De Niro????

包含了馬龍白蘭度和勞勃迪尼諾嗎?這裡rank的意思不是等級,我翻了字典也查不出個適當的解釋,可否請hungji兄看一下新OG的解釋為大家解惑一下呢?

open to discuss

[freshmanduke]

新版的og 小弟還沒看過 一直在看舊版的

whose ranks including arlon Brando and Robert De Niro????

包含了馬龍白蘭度和勞勃迪尼諾嗎?這裡rank的意思不是等級,我翻了字典也查不出個適當的解釋,可否請hungji兄看一下新OG的解釋為大家解惑一下呢?

應該是whose ranks included arlon Brando and Robert De Niro
這裡included 修飾 ranks
ranks在這裡表示層級
是說 所培訓的演員其層級包括馬龍白蘭度和勞勃迪尼諾等等

[christina]

我有個疑問為什麼要用過去式cluded,而不用現在式include????
還有a選中,several generations of actors including
including是修飾generationgs,而generationgs和arlon Brando ,Robert De Niro不一致所以錯了?

[freshmanduke]

新版的og 小弟還沒看過 一直在看舊版的

不過還是提供一下小弟的看法
A. Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, who trained several generations of actors including 在 x of y 的結構當中 x 是主要的 , who 結構 鮮少能夠指代 y ,
小弟想的是 several generations of actors 這裡使用 including 是不是比較不適當呢?? 因為是在形容 generations 阿 而不是actors 所以用 including 有點怪怪的 答案c 沒有這個奇怪的地方 使用的漫恰當的 是說 several generations 的ranks 包含.......

可以在討論看看

這裡我舉個例子好了
Mary is one of Ben's sisters, who is cute.(原諒我 我知道句子很糟) 這裡就明白看出mary 是很cute的那位 因為動詞是 is 所修飾的清楚是mary
如果句子改成Mary is one of Ben's sisters, who are cute
清楚看出cute的是指Ben's sisters
因為A中 who trained 中 trained是過去式 不知道是修飾單數stella
還是複數的artists 所以錯
至於including用法可參考第十版og SC得249
如果是C that inclued就會變成勞跟馬modified generations of actors
可看第十版og SC得249的解釋

[freshmanduke]

[quote="christina"]我有個疑問為什麼要用過去式cluded,而不用現在式include????
quote]

這題本身是以過去式的形式敘述 用included是配合整體形式的呈現
符合一致性

[christina]

我有個疑問為什麼要用過去式cluded,而不用現在式include????
quote]

這題本身是以過去式的形式敘述 用included是配合整體形式的呈現
符合一致性

謝謝~
了解,句子時態要一致!

[hungji]

新版OG 解釋

The original sentence contains a number of modifiers, but not all of them are correctly expressed. The clause "who trained..." describes "Stella Adler", yet a relative clause such as this one must be placed immediately after the noun or pronoun it modifies, and this clause follows "theater" rather than "Adler". Replacing "who trained" with "training" corrects the error because the phrase "training..." modifies the whole preceding clause rather than the single preceding noun. "Several generations of actors including" shows the same error in reverse; "including" modifies the whole phrase, but the 2 actors named are not "generations of actors". The more limiting clause "who ranks included(referring to actors)" is appropriate here.

[freshmanduke]

所以a中including 是修飾不清了
了解了解
至於who是指theater跟stella比較 嗯恩
不過感覺真有點怪的說

[Pufa]

several generations of actors including Marlon Brando and Robert De Niro.
including讓人以為數個世代的明星就只包含馬龍白蘭度跟勞伯迪尼洛。

用who included之類的限定一下會比較精準一點。

[Pufa]

至於who是指theater跟stella比較 嗯恩
不過感覺真有點怪的說

duke可不可以稍微替我說明一下。
因為我在解釋裡面沒看到這句話.....