[討論]OG127(分詞題型歸納)

[davidlee0222]

這個問題非常好
問到核心概念及細微的辨析

句子有結構跟文意兩部份
在結構上and在這裡完全沒有因果關係
and永遠不會有因果關係
這裡因果是因為文句所表達的"意思"

and的功能是前後對等且在同一"時間點"
因為這裡前後詞句有時間順序
這個時間順序是因為and前後有時差的結果
and會把前後事件再同一個"時點"做連結
是warmer weather return這件事跟rots the fruit兩件事拼起來
時間上一前一後用and連結成同一時點
造成"句意本身"出現因果
不是因為and而有任何因果功能
而是因為return 跟 rots

仔細看解說前半
E has "parallel infinitives"
平行結構不會有因果
是兩個對等事件在同一時間平面上

[chvenson]

大衛神功 名不虛傳 令小弟矛塞頓開 感謝...
就這麼巧 昨晚做題時看到一題同類型的

大全315
315. Framed by traitorous colleagues, Alfred Dreyfus was imprisoned for twelve years before there was exoneration and his freedom.
(A) there was exoneration and his freedom
(B) he was to be exonerated with freedom
(C) being exonerated and freed
(D) exoneration and his freedom
(E) being freed, having been exonerated

Ans: C

before being exonerated and freed
表明了Alfred Dreyfus被證明無罪和被釋放 => 時間差
句意因果 非and表示因果
被證明無罪 => 被釋放

[dibert8]

and 平衡結構, 跟因果應該沒有關聯.

[enshare]

關於上面的大全315

(C)還原之後：before he was exonerated and freed.
省略之後，before（保留）he（同主詞省略）was（變成being），being不是應該要被省略嗎？

為什麼在(C)當中還是保留呢？

請教大家
謝謝

[dibert8]

大全315
(C) 裡的 being 表示被無罪開釋的當時(瞬間),所以用進行式.

[carowill]

我想請教這題(OV的91題 )的C
解答寫的
The sentence uses present-tense; "having been assigned"
casts doubt on whether the employees are still assighned
to the UN
是什麼意思呀

我答題時的理解是 having been assigned 會變成錯誤修飾的分辭
所以刪掉了
可是歐機這樣寫我無法理解耶

請大大賜教~~:)

前面的高手有提到了
形容詞子句比主要子句的動作時間早，也不可改分詞

原因在於會造成句意理解上的錯誤 會不知道發生的先後
所以==> casts doubt on whether the employees are still assighned
to the UN

[carowill]

我想請教這題(OV的91題 )的C
解答寫的
The sentence uses present-tense; "having been assigned"
casts doubt on whether the employees are still assighned
to the UN
是什麼意思呀

我答題時的理解是 having been assigned 會變成錯誤修飾的分辭
所以刪掉了
可是歐機這樣寫我無法理解耶

請大大賜教~~:)

前面的高手有提到了
形容詞子句比主要子句的動作時間早，也不可改分詞

原因在於會造成句意理解上的錯誤 會不知道發生的先後
所以==> casts doubt on whether the employees are still assighned
to the UN

[nemolee]

In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for their employees' paychecks, assigned by them to the United Nations.
(A)for their employees' paychecks, assigned by them
(B)for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned
(C)for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned
(D)in place of their employees' paychecks, for those of them assigned
(E)in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them

ans : b

我想問(A)的部份的them有四個小小疑惑...
請問 them 是錯誤的指到 living allowances ?
還是錯誤的指到 paychecks ?
還是就綜合上述２個狀況，就是不知指誰，所以句意不清?
還是這個 them 根本就沒有指代對象?

謝謝

[Huang Hsin-Yi]

In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for their employees' paychecks, assigned by them to the United Nations.
(A)for their employees' paychecks, assigned by them
(B)for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned
(C)for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned
(D)in place of their employees' paychecks, for those of them assigned
(E)in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them

ans : b

我想問(A)的部份的them有四個小小疑惑...
請問 them 是錯誤的指到 living allowances ?
還是錯誤的指到 paychecks ?
還是就綜合上述２個狀況，就是不知指誰，所以句意不清?
還是這個 them 根本就沒有指代對象?

謝謝

[nemolee]

還是有小小小疑惑..
ex. I can't find my keys. I forget where i put them.
就them 指 keys ..
這題.. however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for ......, assigned by them......
把(A)刪掉的原先原因，因them 指 allowances，造成句意怪.. 所以(A) out ~
再進一步的問為什麼 them根本就沒有指代對象? (一直認為them有指代，只是代了之後造成句意怪)
感謝指點..

[Huang Hsin-Yi]

喔~ 可是在心中還是有小小小疑惑..
ex. I can't find my keys. I forget where i put them.
就them 指 keys ..
這題.. however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for ......, assigned by them......
我把(A)刪掉的原先原因，是因為把them 指 allowances，造成句意怪 ==> 藉由零用金分派到聯合國 ? .. 所以我就把(A) out ~

再進一步的問一下，此題為什麼 them根本就沒有指代對象? 是我那邊的想法錯了(我一直認為them有指代，只是代了之後造成句意怪)
感謝指點..

[nemolee]

thanks

[larry.tw]

In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for their employees' paychecks, assigned by them to the United Nations.
(A)for their employees' paychecks, assigned by them
(B)for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned
(C)for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned
(D)in place of their employees' paychecks, for those of them assigned
(E)in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them

ans : b

請問如果將B選項改成
for the paychecks of their employees having been assigned
是不是也OK呢??

[Philosophia]

請問如果將B選項改成
for the paychecks of their employees having been assigned
是不是也OK呢??

不成哦～

一般而言，分詞也可以用來形容前面的名詞，但這裏有時態的問題，所以還是要用關係子句才能說明清楚囉～

[larry.tw]

謝謝sophia~~~

剛好想起之前在白勇看到的規則
時態儘量簡單（一般過去，一般現在，一般將來，一般進行，複雜的時態如：過去將來完成式等都算錯。having/being錯誤標誌，但有特例
credit+having，the chance of being, the distinction of being.而且這些特例出現就選）