[問題]天山4-4

[yotoan]

謝謝c大!!
經泥這麼一點..
我覺得D好多了~

[CUGGYER]

說一下自己對這題的小技巧(很快看出答案)
從句意可看出 win the Nobel Prize很重要
因此B E (that won) 重要性變弱 刪掉
C in addition to 囉唆 刪
A D相比 in 1909在A容易有出現修飾語誤置 D文意通暢
選D

[林小馬]

說一下自己對這題的小技巧(很快看出答案)
從句意可看出 win the Nobel Prize很重要
因此B E (that won) 重要性變弱 刪掉
C in addition to 囉唆 刪
A D相比 in 1909在A容易有出現修飾語誤置 D文意通暢
選D

不管文法的話
我覺得可以看主要子句來判斷合不合理喔

之前有人問A
不過看A的主要子句(扣掉所有修飾) 其實就是
in 1909 Selma Lagerlof was the noelist (who...形容novelist)
完全沒有重點啊

可是D的話 主要子句就是
Selma Lagerlof became in 1909 the first woman and also the first Swedish writer to win the Nobel Prize for Literature.

重點是 他是第一個女性及Swedish諾貝爾文學獎得獎人啊
重點不是他是個小說家啊

[Pufa]

說一下自己對這題的小技巧(很快看出答案)
從句意可看出 win the Nobel Prize很重要
因此B E (that won) 重要性變弱 刪掉
C in addition to 囉唆 刪
A D相比 in 1909在A容易有出現修飾語誤置 D文意通暢
選D

不管文法的話
我覺得可以看主要子句來判斷合不合理喔

之前有人問A
不過看A的主要子句(扣掉所有修飾) 其實就是
in 1909 Selma Lagerlof was the noelist (who...形容novelist)
完全沒有重點啊

可是D的話 主要子句就是
Selma Lagerlof became in 1909 the first woman and also the first Swedish writer to win the Nobel Prize for Literature.

重點是 他是第一個女性及Swedish諾貝爾文學獎得獎人啊
重點不是他是個小說家啊

不同於你的觀點，
我覺得只有逗號相隔的修飾語才能拿掉不看。:laugh

A:
in 1909 Selma Lagerlof was the noelist and was the first woman...

in 1909的位置太遜了，
句意變成：
SL在1909年是一個小說家，也是第一個女諾貝爾獎得主。

事實上SL一直是一個小說家，直到1909年才得獎。
D清楚地表達了這個意思。

[Janet]

請問 BE錯在哪邊?

B. She turned away from literary realism and wrote romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and novelist Selma Lagerlöf in 1909 became the first woman as well as the first Swedish writer that won

--->因為and用得不好嗎?

E. As a novelist, Selma Lagerlöf turned away from literary realism and wrote romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 becoming the first woman and also the first Swedish writer that won

--->因為and用得不好嗎?

[davidlee0222]

BE都是句型結構問題
B應該是dangling結構錯誤
最前面的she跟鬥號後的and應該要去掉

E是第二個鬥號後結構謬誤
and 看起來滿平衡
open to discuss

[juyu]

請問一下"E是第二個鬥號後結構謬誤"..這個部分可否再詳細說一下,謝謝大衛大俠..

[pimi]

C選項有個in addition to
我知道各位大大都說in addition to 囉唆
也知道C不能選
只是這裡有個小小文法問題想問

莫杯杯有說過像是 because of, despite等字後不能加Ving 只能接純名詞
想請問各位大大
那in addition to後可以接Ving嗎?

因為C選項的 in addition to後就接了個 winning的Ving
想問除了 in addition to囉唆外, 在後面接Ving, 這樣文法對嗎??

[dibert8]

(A) 在 1909 年 Selma Lagerl 她 turn away from literary realism ... 是不合理的, 她應該早在得獎之前就 turn away 了.
(B) , and 後面是次要結構,得獎應該是重點吧!搬到次要結構去,就失去重點了.
(C) in addition to 表示在她之外另有人也得獎 (Selma Lagerl + first Swedish writer 共同得獎; 而且 Selma Lagerl 不是 first Swedish writer); in addition to the first Swedish writer winning = in addition to the first Swedish writer who won 這麼說,其實 Selma Lagerl 並沒有得獎,而是那位 first Swedish writer 得獎. (in addition to + "the first Swedish writer" 並沒有接 Ving)
(E) 得獎的句意重點搬到次要結構去了=>改變句意.
=> (D)

[whoops]

問個小問題
本題中A每個選項都有出現turned away from literary realism(A) to wrote romantic stories(B)..

from A to B..不用顧及到parallel的問題嗎?因為一個是Adj+N,另一個是V+Adj+N

[dibert8]

turn away {from +N} 是動詞片語
to... 是不定詞 (= in order to)

[whoops]

turn away {from +N} 是動詞片語
to... 是不定詞 (= in order to)

完全了解,thanks!!

[lucyyeh]

請問

D. A novelist who turned away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, Selma Lagerlof became in 1909 the first woman and also the first Swedish writer to win

這裡的in 1909 為什麼要擺在這，是 由輕到重的原則嗎?
跟擺在, 後 Selma 前有何不同? 還是都對?

[dibert8]

became 'in 1909': in 1909 修飾動詞 became.
放 Selma Lagerlof 前則修飾後面全句,但是 Selma Lagerlof 要跟前面 A novelist 同位,中間夾一個 in 1909 句意變得不明確(好像兩個人講話,中間冒出一個人來插嘴).
A novelist, in 1909 Selma Lagerlof ... 有強調 1909 的意味,但 Selma Lagerlof 並非在 1909 才是 novelist.

[bibbyshiu]

請教各位.
在(B)(E)選項最後, a writer "that"能否列為一個錯誤? 因為a writer應該用who去修飾, 而非that.

另外前面的(A)選項的in 1909的討論, 能否解釋為in 1909修飾 the novelist who becaome the first..., 強調她是1909當年所有的novelist中變為first..的那個novelist, 而非強調在1909她變為novelist. 句意應該可以接受這樣

不過, 大家對於(A)選項的形容詞討論跟(C)選項的in addition to 討論讓我收穫良多. 感謝.