Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - GWD4-Q2

GWD4-Q2

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

Re: GWD4-Q2

文章soami » 2005-03-29 15:34

QQcandy \$m[1]:Q2:
In Greek theology the supreme being was Esaugetu Emissee (Master of Breath), who dwelt in an upper realm in which the sky was the floor, and who had the power to give and to take away the breath of life.

A. in which the sky was the floor, and who had the power to give and to take

B. where the sky was the floor, having the power to give and to take

C. whose floor was the sky, and who has the power of giving and of taking

D. in which the sky was the floor, with the power of giving and taking
E. whose floor was the sky, having the power to give and take


the correct answer is A, 請問為啥 floor 跟 and 中間為啥要多加一個逗點, 我找不到三個可以平衡吶....

還有 WITH 的用法怎麼用....為啥 D 不對 ^o)


這題已經定案了嗎??

小弟有不同的意見耶

這題我選B.
In Greek theology the supreme being was Esaugetu Emissee (Master of Breath), who dwelt in an upper realmwhere the sky was the floor, having the power to give and to take away the breath of life.
撇開中間插入語,having the power to give and to take away the breath of life 修飾主要子句的主詞supreme being應該沒有歧異吧。
這句原來的樣子 (While) (because) the supreme had the power to give and to take away the breath of life. 連接詞主詞去掉had改成ving,我覺得蠻合理的阿。

來看A,in which the sky was the floor, and who had the power to give and to take
who 都是修是同樣修飾一個人,用一個就很經濟啦,who dwelt xxx and had xxx
我認為who可省而沒省,不知道大家有什麼看法。
lol
頭像
soami
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 83
註冊時間: 2004-12-16 00:49

文章cocaine » 2005-03-29 22:55

B,having修飾會有粉多分歧點.
A.,and who 比較清楚再說天神宙斯.
另外A要這樣寫也是因為中間插了who dwelt in an upper realm in which the sky was the floor 句子太長,and who之前加個逗號只是做個說話段句的意義而已.
不然會誤解為who dwelt in an upper realm in which the sky was the floor and who.....句子變的不清楚
要是把who拿掉又會誤解the sky was the floor and ....
在說明who dwelt...

agree A
努力,才有甜蜜的果實
頭像
cocaine
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 502
註冊時間: 2004-12-23 23:53
來自: Mar

文章hungji » 2005-07-05 21:24

(邏輯錯誤請指正)
1.快速觀察比較五個答案
2.差異(1)in which與where與whose (2)平衡and(3)動詞平衡
3.看題目
4.看答案後面and平衡, 刪 E; whose與who has 刪 C
5.A,B,D 決選, 選 A 句意完整 時態對稱
快速作答 提升對率 繼續下一題
頭像
hungji
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 291
註冊時間: 2005-06-24 14:06

文章maronchen1103 » 2005-09-20 17:12

沒錯!!
多謝大家的提醒....
讓我想起了答題技巧裡有一條Having+名詞少選
maronchen1103
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 54
註冊時間: 2005-09-01 23:14

文章ustoday » 2005-09-23 23:29

幫忙看看這樣的推論對不對
(d) with 副詞片語 修飾前面的動詞 作伴隨 或是修飾最靠近的名詞
如果修飾 前面動詞 這裡前面動詞是was
however, Be動詞的句型意義 是表definition ( A is B ) 並無動作可以讓with 修飾
名詞修飾floor 但 with 內容不合理
所以with 不能使用
頭像
ustoday
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 76
註冊時間: 2005-08-12 02:10

Re: GWD4-Q2

文章dibert8 » 2007-05-22 23:18

soami \$m[1]:
QQcandy \$m[1]:Q2:
In Greek theology the supreme being was Esaugetu Emissee (Master of Breath), who dwelt in an upper realm in which the sky was the floor, and who had the power to give and to take away the breath of life.

A. in which the sky was the floor, and who had the power to give and to take

B. where the sky was the floor, having the power to give and to take

C. whose floor was the sky, and who has the power of giving and of taking

D. in which the sky was the floor, with the power of giving and taking
E. whose floor was the sky, having the power to give and take


the correct answer is A, 請問為啥 floor 跟 and 中間為啥要多加一個逗點, 我找不到三個可以平衡吶....

還有 WITH 的用法怎麼用....為啥 D 不對 ^o)


這題已經定案了嗎??

小弟有不同的意見耶

這題我選B.
In Greek theology the supreme being was Esaugetu Emissee (Master of Breath), who dwelt in an upper realmwhere the sky was the floor, having the power to give and to take away the breath of life.
撇開中間插入語,having the power to give and to take away the breath of life 修飾主要子句的主詞supreme being應該沒有歧異吧。
這句原來的樣子 (While) (because) the supreme had the power to give and to take away the breath of life. 連接詞主詞去掉had改成ving,我覺得蠻合理的阿。

來看A,in which the sky was the floor, and who had the power to give and to take
who 都是修是同樣修飾一個人,用一個就很經濟啦,who dwelt xxx and had xxx
我認為who可省而沒省,不知道大家有什麼看法。


解釋非限定用法符合 OG 標準解答的精神(i.e. having 的主詞是 being),但是 (B) 這樣就改變句意了,因為原句 (A) 兩個 who 都指 Esaugetu Emissee (主要子句的主詞補語).
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章dibert8 » 2007-05-22 23:27

cocaine \$m[1]:B,having修飾會有粉多分歧點.
A.,and who 比較清楚再說天神宙斯.
另外A要這樣寫也是因為中間插了who dwelt in an upper realm in which the sky was the floor 句子太長,and who之前加個逗號只是做個說話段句的意義而已.
不然會誤解為who dwelt in an upper realm in which the sky was the floor and who.....句子變的不清楚
要是把who拿掉又會誤解the sky was the floor and ....
在說明who dwelt...

agree A


同意 and 前面加豆號的說法:另起一句補充說明使句意清楚.
having 可能造成修飾歧異:
1. In Greek theology the supreme being was Esaugetu Emissee (Master of Breath), {who dwelt in an upper realm where the sky was the floor,} having the power to give and to take => 插句去掉, having 修飾主要子句,主詞是 being.
2. In Greek theology the supreme being was Esaugetu Emissee (Master of Breath), {who dwelt in an upper realm where the sky was the floor, having the power to give and to take} => 修飾前面的插句, 主詞是 who (= Esaugetu Emissee).
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章ad264 » 2008-05-21 23:18

總之 B,D,E的寫法(having ....& with....),外國人都會讀成 the floor had the power.
Look on the bright side
ad264
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 86
註冊時間: 2007-04-05 10:41

上一頁

回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 7 位訪客