[問題]GWD12-Q34

[szyang]

In an attempt to guarantee the security of its innovative water purification method, the company required each employee to sign a confidentiality agreement prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies using an analogous purification process.

A. prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies
B. prohibiting them from the disclosing of its water purification methods to any company
C. prohibiting disclosure of its water purification methods to any company
D. that would prohibit them from disclosure of its water purification methods to companies
E. that would prohibit its water purification methods to be disclosed to a company
答案是c
請問喔,prohibit 後面不是應該加from嗎

這提答案似乎有爭論
某版答案為E(忘了是哪一版)
題目出的不好
CE都有瑕疵
小弟個人較傾向E
此提為結構意義題

先用代名詞刪
BD中them都是在指each employee
數量移轉
剩ACE
再來將是ETS進階的"主軸結構意義"概念

ABC的分辭補述為"次要結構"
非文句的"主軸結構"
可將次要結構拿掉不影響原文主軸
而次要結構分辭補述prohibiting若可以拿掉
confidentiality agreement 意義將不完整
不知事蛇麼保密協定
必須用that來帶出保密協定是拿來幹麻的
(莫北北有講過-what agreement? 要用that)

且分辭補述是在補述"附帶狀態"
不是補述"內容"
要講agreement的內容要用that
否則意義不完整

原句意是要講保密協定的"內容"
不是要講保密協定"剛好處於蛇麼狀態"
ABC都在講員工簽了這個保密協定"剛好阻止了機密被洩漏"
非原句意所要傳達的意思
是要講這個協定的"內容"是要阻止機密被洩漏
只有DE可以選
D指代數量移轉不選
選E

prohibit from為慣用法
但小弟印象中曾在某字典查過prohibit不一定要用from
E為主軸一貫的動作概念
動作大於狀態
唯一問題出在to be

佩服...但我覺得E是不是不應該用would勒?因為是sign a confidentiality agreement...

另外有沒有人知道在此用any company, a company,companies都是可以的媽?

[hotbug]

我就是因為 C 裡面寫 any company 才死不選
難道 any company 可以嗎 不是應該要 any other company 嗎???

後來搞董了! 可惡陷阱 any company 後面有修飾用的 using an analogous purification process.
因為此已經排除原本的那家 company 所以不用額外加 other

[zuckzhc]

我就是因為 C 裡面寫 any company 才死不選
難道 any company 可以嗎 不是應該要 any other company 嗎???

後來搞董了! 可惡陷阱 any company 後面有修飾用的 using an analogous purification process.
因為此已經排除原本的那家 company 所以不用額外加 other

同意,順便推一下
感謝分享
我覺得這是個不錯的判別方式
這應該是ETS故意設下的一個陷阱;devil
大家要小心

[CUGGYER]

請問E的would時態有錯嗎 that當同位語補充N時
that時態有什麼限制嗎?


雖然我把他刪掉了原因是 a company usining (有指定不可用a)
但是agreement +that 實在是ets通則阿

[davidslin]

我是覺得prohibit是帶有強制意思的動詞 既然一個agreement是要強制禁止一件事 就不應該有would這種假設性的字眼
所以我ㄧ開始就把DE刪掉了.......

[Janet]

另外有沒有人知道在此用any company, a company,companies都是可以的媽?

我剛開始就是用company刪答案,因為

companies using an analogous purification process

單複數不一,我利用一致性,把AD刪掉!!!

請指教~

[modern]

另外有沒有人知道在此用any company, a company,companies都是可以的媽?

我剛開始就是用company刪答案,因為

companies using an analogous purification process

單複數不一,我利用一致性,把AD刪掉!!!

請指教~

CE 決選

C勝在 1. any用的好 比a好 2. disclosure用的比被動的 to be disclosed to 好

選C

ps....本題小弟我也上ETS當 看到any compaby直接畫掉XD

老莫要人別看一半整句看完 這件事情真的是很重要 別偷懶貪時間阿 划不來的 ><

[FiscJanet]

In an attempt to guarantee the security of its innovative water purification method, the company required each employee to sign a confidentiality agreement prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies using an analogous purification process.

A. prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies
B. prohibiting them from the disclosing of its water purification methods to any company
C. prohibiting disclosure of its water purification methods to any company
D. that would prohibit them from disclosure of its water purification methods to companies
E. that would prohibit its water purification methods to be disclosed to a company
答案是c
請問喔,prohibit 後面不是應該加from嗎

這提答案似乎有爭論
某版答案為E(忘了是哪一版)
題目出的不好
CE都有瑕疵
小弟個人較傾向E
此提為結構意義題

先用代名詞刪
BD中them都是在指each employee
數量移轉
剩ACE
再來將是ETS進階的"主軸結構意義"概念

ABC的分辭補述為"次要結構"
非文句的"主軸結構"
可將次要結構拿掉不影響原文主軸
而次要結構分辭補述prohibiting若可以拿掉
confidentiality agreement 意義將不完整
不知事蛇麼保密協定
必須用that來帶出保密協定是拿來幹麻的
(莫北北有講過-what agreement? 要用that)

我是選E的...
我也記得莫北北有講過要用that來帶出保密協定是拿來幹麻，
但是我好像記得說要用that名詞子句表同位，
可是E選項that後面並非一個完整的句子，所以，覺得有點怪！
但是又覺得C沒有用that帶出agreement的內容，不好！

所以同意david的看法：認為此題出的有瑕疵！

[cathlin]

我也記得莫北北有講過要用that來帶出保密協定是拿來幹麻，
但是我好像記得說要用名詞子句表同位，
可是E選項that後面並非一個完整的句子，所以，覺得有點怪！
但是又覺得C沒有用that帶出agreement的內容，不好！

[color=green][color=violet]prefer C
我不認為C中的prohibiting.....是表示agreement的內容
而應該是形容詞片語修飾agreement，
即 agreement which prohibits.....之意，
所以不需要加that

open to discuss....[/color][/color]

[elvilla]

c

[lanbow]

我也覺得E，雖然我很蠢的選了B.......

記得莫老師說過，陳述一個事實不需要用假設法

也就是agreement後面如果接的是內容，即是一項白紙黑字的事實

那麼就應該是 agreement that S + V

但是如果agreement後面接的是agreement的目的，

也就是這個agreement會帶來的後果，就應該為

agreement that + would + V

在這題裡，我認為後面的敘述是為了表達agreement的目的

防止這家公司的方法外洩

所以E選項裡面的 agreement that would prohibit......

就顯得較精準了 我的想法啦 大家覺得有錯要糾正我喔

[soami]

E. that would prohibit its water purification methods to be disclosed to a company

E的用法不符合慣用語，可以直接刪掉。

正確用法應該這樣寫：that would prohibit its water purification methods from being disclosed to a company

[mulderhou]

E. that would prohibit its water purification methods to be disclosed to a company

E的用法不符合慣用語，可以直接刪掉。

正確用法應該這樣寫：that would prohibit its water purification methods from being disclosed to a company

但我之前上老方的休辭課時 , 記得他說過inhibit跟prohibit不是接from是接to耶 , 而且C的句意唸起來不通順 *-)

[ahuang44]

soami 寫到:
E. that would prohibit its water purification methods to be disclosed to a company

E的用法不符合慣用語，可以直接刪掉。

正確用法應該這樣寫：that would prohibit its water purification methods from being disclosed to a company


但我之前上老方的休辭課時 , 記得他說過inhibit跟prohibit不是接from是接to耶 , 而且C的句意唸起來不通順

請參考11版的OV#48, #91, prohibit/inhibit O from Ving是正確的, forbid 才是forbid O to V

[whoops]

我不認為C中的prohibiting.....是表示agreement的內容
而應該是形容詞片語修飾agreement，
即 agreement which prohibits.....之意，
所以不需要加that

本來認為是這個結構的
但是agreement which prohibits的限定用法不就也犯了和E同樣的錯,因為它前面的原句是to sign a confidentiality agreement prohibiting..
難以抉擇,大家再討論..