Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 查看主题 - [問題]天山4-Q12

[問題]天山4-Q12

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

帖子juyu » 2005-11-22 10:54

我發現真有類似文章...

When it comes to milk production, nothing beats Holsteins. For the farmer who takes care to keep them cool, sated with high-energy chow, and milked regularly—often under the management of a sophisticated computer—these familiar black-and-white cows produce an average of 2,275 gallons of milk each per year. The average Brown Swiss, in contrast, produced only 1,820 gallons last year, and a Jersey less than 1,600......


http://www.sciencenews.org/pages/sn_arc ... 7/bob1.htm
juyu
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 33
注册: 2005-07-25 22:01

帖子pamelatsai » 2005-12-03 04:08

coulomb \$m[1]:這題我選E
我覺得For farmers who....是因為由輕到重所以拉到前面來
原句應該是Provided with high-energy feed, and milked regularly, Holstein cows will produce an average of 2,275 gallons of milk each per year for the farmer who takes care to keep them cool.
所以這一句的主詞是cows
如果這樣看的話, 同一句話裡面的代名詞只能代一樣的東西, 由於for farmer子句中的them指cows
所以A中的them就是指cows ,而providing是 cows provid改成主動的分詞片語變成的
所以A會變成 cows providing them(cows) with high-energy feed ,and milking them(cows)....
造成句意不合理 牛自己提供自己食物 牛自己擠自己的牛奶 :oo (夭壽喔~~)
不過E的and前面為什麼要打逗點還是很奇怪
請大家指教~


強烈支持~~
從句意來看~~provided...milked...是用來修飾cows
如果選A,變成分詞構句修飾farmer的動作~~
一來不平衡~~二來句意也不對了~~
头像
pamelatsai
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 98
注册: 2005-11-04 17:39

帖子Miranda's » 2005-12-11 00:51

cocaine \$m[1]:E還原:
(while Holstein cows are) provided with high-energy feed, and milked regularly, Holstein cows will produce Attention:

請問,究竟要怎麼看出是否有省略???謝謝賜教^^
头像
Miranda's
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 49
注册: 2005-10-07 20:13

帖子sevenmao » 2006-07-15 22:41

For farmer who takes care to keep them cool, provided with high-energy feed, and milked regularly, Holstein cows will produce an average of 2,275 gallons of milk.
原來主詞是Holstein cow, 一直以為farmer是主詞才會選有them的答案呀,我。
這是我的理解, for farmer who takes care...是補充說明
所以是if provided,..., milked

亂說一通囉
單眼皮的女生還真可憐 -_-
头像
sevenmao
新手會員
新手會員
 
帖子: 15
注册: 2006-01-11 00:00

帖子A級垂耳兔 » 2006-12-23 16:19

不搞一些廢話句意...直接用文法破解...
B..C..D錯的太明顯不再贊述....
答案A要對明顯是以farmer做主詞...但farmer在此是"介詞+N"的形式...
如何判定FOR是介詞? 看到後面沒動詞就知了...
故不可能以"介詞+N"做主詞
看到milking是主動的分詞片語...只好往後找主詞...靠~~竟然是cows
A選項變成cows自己在擠奶....所以A一定錯
答案E是省略(keep them) provided...,and (keep them) milked 的形式
头像
A級垂耳兔
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 451
注册: 2006-09-04 17:47
地址: 台北市

帖子Penny Lee » 2006-12-23 22:31

coulomb \$m[1]:這題我選E
我覺得For farmers who....是因為由輕到重所以拉到前面來
原句應該是Provided with high-energy feed, and milked regularly, Holstein cows will produce an average of 2,275 gallons of milk each per year for the farmer who takes care to keep them cool.
所以這一句的主詞是cows
如果這樣看的話, 同一句話裡面的代名詞只能代一樣的東西, 由於for farmer子句中的them指cows
所以A中的them就是指cows ,而providing是 cows provid改成主動的分詞片語變成的
所以A會變成 cows providing them(cows) with high-energy feed ,and milking them(cows)....
造成句意不合理 牛自己提供自己食物 牛自己擠自己的牛奶 :oo (夭壽喔~~)
不過E的and前面為什麼要打逗點還是很奇怪
請大家指教~



同意大大所說,支持E
Penny Lee
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 97
注册: 2005-11-20 13:25
地址: KAO

帖子dibert8 » 2007-09-24 10:12

這題做的時候卡在找不到 and 跟誰平衡,兔大解的好,原來是跟 cool 平衡: i.e. keep them {cool, provided..., and milked...} 三個平衡 and 前面要加逗點.
另外卡在 選項裡的分詞到底要修飾誰,覺得跟前面一定有關聯.看到主詞是牛,勉強當分詞構句來做: (D) (E) 選一個.覺得不需要未來式,後來發現非劃線部份有個each (每隻牛), (D) 只有一隻牛,何必 each?
這題的結構: For farmers ..., Holstein cows will produce ... 原來是考平衡,不是分詞構句.
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
帖子: 2202
注册: 2007-01-08 01:17

帖子ad264 » 2008-05-20 20:25

這一題到底要不要Holstein cows will produce 未來式,摘要國外的帖
* the future form "will produce" is appropriate for a general scientific truth.
* The use of the progressive tense "are producing" is inappropriate to describe a general scientific truth.

提供後人研究此題之連結,解釋此題很清楚!
http://www.urch.com/forums/gmat-sentenc ... lileo.html
Look on the bright side
ad264
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 86
注册: 2007-04-05 10:41

上一页

回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

在线用户

正在浏览此版面的用户:没有注册用户 和 10 位游客