GWD7-2

[dibert8]

(A) 用了 it was ... that 的加強語氣句型, it 是虛主詞,當 drama 的同位語; and 前面加豆號把連接詞子句放入次要結構 (不是平衡兩個)
(D) 我覺得 and 前面應該加豆號,雖然 and 連接兩個句子,其實這兩個句子並不頂對稱: 1. 主動 vs 被動, 2. Vt vs be 顯然句子本意並不要求對稱,所以 and 的功能以補充說明的成分居多,這是我覺得應該加豆號的原因.

但我不確定虛主詞可不可以作同位語,有人可以指點一下嗎?

[FIG]

"但我不確定虛主詞可不可以作同位語,有人可以指點一下嗎"
你的意思是 像這種 it was Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun 強調句型
直接用 被強調的 Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun 來當同位嗎？

[vantreal]

但我不確定虛主詞可不可以作同位語,有人可以指點一下嗎?

"代名詞若為主詞, 優先代替原題主詞".
可是這題真正主詞在後.....

[dibert8]

想起莫伯伯講過:同位語抽象在前,具體在後.
it 放在前面一堆名詞後面,讓前面的名詞片語變得更抽象,看起來行不通.更何況它是"虛"的.

[Huang Hsin-Yi]

E. A Raisin in the Sun, by Lorraine Hansberry, won the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award in 1959, and later made it

three errors can be found .
first, A rasin in the sun does not make itself into the movie. it was being made. The choice E lacks "was".
second," make it into "is unidiomatic.
third, by Lorraine Hansberry was put between the two commas. hence, it can be used to modify A raisin in the sun or the new york drama critics' cirle. it made some ambiguity here.

Your explanation is very clear, thanks!

[larry.tw]

1.快速觀察5個答案
2.差異(1)Lorraine Hansberry's 與 Lorraine Hansberry 與A Raisin in the Sun (2)in 1959 的位置 (3)it was later made與was later made 與 later made it
3.回到原題 The first.. to and the first.. by, 同位語, 刪 A, C
4.注意 in 1959 位置, 原題應為 時間副詞修飾Award, 刪 B
5.剩 D,E; 嗯!!! it 指誰? D,E 哪個短 (莫北北粉利害)
6.選 D, D 對了~

請問有誰知道
為啥第三個:原題 The first.. to and the first.. by, 同位語, 刪 A, C
1.怎麼知道它是同位語?
2.位啥知道要刪除A,C

另外D選項
D. Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun won the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award in 1959 and was later made

3."A Raisin in the Sun "為啥不用被動,我覺得這個drama不能主動贏得獎阿!!

昏頭中@_@