GWD6-22

[davidlee0222]

(Because he was)Very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight, Charles Lindbergh .....

其實這和micht同學講的一樣，副詞片語放句首，既是省略，又是考你主詞的應用能力
如果你是美加同學，請參考學期一開始就發的紅色講義第十頁左右吧，省略副詞片語放句首的修飾原則

老大~幫你補充一下
這裡看起來是being省略
雖然意思翻起來一樣
但是在歐雞裡
because跟being結構意義不同
算改變句意

若是because就不能省
being可省
且符合脫節句法的分辭位置

[agk99]

連接詞都能省啦
這是省略修飾片語
當然我的because是假設的，只要放一個連接詞在這，句意不要差太多都行
畢竟你怎麼知道原始作者是要寫什麼
當然我同意，放being更好，起碼不更動原始句子的意思

[simommmm]

不管being到底要不要省
脫節居然沒鬥號
必錯 刪

請問所謂"脫節沒逗號"的錯誤在哪裡??
因為我當初是保留D選項(因看不出明顯錯誤)
看到E才選了E
請教是如何快速刪去E的呢??

[Behemoth]

你應該是要問如何刪d吧

1.形容詞子句當同位語要有逗號
2.being多餘

[simommmm]

你應該是要問如何刪d吧

1.形容詞子句當同位語要有逗號
2.being多餘

嗯嗯 對 我是要問如何刪D 不小心打錯了
可是不看不出D有同位語耶
我看D的句子結構是這樣子
Being.........(主詞) was(動詞) the reason that Charles......(主詞補語)
請指正 謝謝

不過我同意being刪掉是比較簡潔的
但再附帶一問 being刪掉固然比較好 但如果不刪不知何不合文法呢??

[Behemoth]

我所謂同位語的意思是說
正確答案應該要像e這樣同位語寫法最簡潔
抱歉沒說清楚
再來d也犯了be動詞平衡的錯誤

being不省本身是合英語文法的
但是at中真的很少選

[hungji]

1.觀察五答案
2.差異(1)主詞與子句(2)being,Being 吼~有點難判定
3.直接看原句意....嗯 流水句 刪 A
4.Since....,so S+V 刪 C
5.Being 少選
6.看 E, (CL was)very reluctant to.... 咦! 不錯. 選E, E 對了

[CUGGYER]

請問這題的D是否有犯 be前後對稱的原則 very reluctant .....was the reason
並且reason不會reluctant
我是這樣刪掉D 請教思路有出錯嗎

[VC]

本提請參考"獨立分詞片語結構"

[doways]

本提請參考"獨立分詞片語結構"

1. 我有翻了一下~

可是找的都是不同主詞構成的獨立分詞片於結構~~

不然就是有動詞，非Be動詞~~

我覺得這個類型不太像是這位大大所講的那個樣子~~

2. 而如果照Agk大前面說過Being拿來省略，

有形容詞片語[大大的說法是說它是副詞子句的省略]放句首的用法嗎?

修辭高峰會page 130我有看到在Being~當Because

所以我會覺得B好像會比E還要好~

3. 而莫老師的筆記第十頁的部分所提到的~

好像也是比較類似於

a. "獨立分詞片語結構"
b. 副詞子句省略，但是在相同主詞，而動詞非Be動詞形式的狀態

4. 如果是倒裝的話，那動詞是不是應該也要換個位置。

嗯~這是小弟的疑問~

請大家多多指教~

[hccill]

想請問各位大大,

如果這一題的選項(D)把being去掉,是否就對了?

是否可以看成ㄧ個倒裝句呢?

(D)Very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight was the reason that Charles Lindbergh refused to carry even a pound of mail, despite being offered $1,000 to do so.

=>原句:The reason that Charles Lindbergh refused to carry even a pound of mail, despite being offered $1,000 to do so, was very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight.
然後是因為要由輕到重, 所以才倒奘呢?

謝謝喔!
[rainbow][/rainbow][rainbow][/rainbow]

[joyce0519]

想請問各位大大,

如果這一題的選項(D)把being去掉,是否就對了?

是否可以看成ㄧ個倒裝句呢?

(D)Very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight was the reason that Charles Lindbergh refused to carry even a pound of mail, despite being offered $1,000 to do so.

=>原句:The reason that Charles Lindbergh refused to carry even a pound of mail, despite being offered $1,000 to do so, was very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight.
然後是因為要由輕到重, 所以才倒奘呢?

原句這樣好像有一點奇怪?The reason~~was very recultant~~
原因應該不會不情願,對嗎?
open to discuss
謝謝喔!
[rainbow][/rainbow][rainbow][/rainbow]

[la-vie]

我自己的看法
(D)Being very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight was the reason that Charles Lindbergh

這句應該沒有脫節的問題
(把was之前都看成主詞；the reason是受詞；that後面是補充說明的名詞子句)

不過和(E)比起來
(D)真的太囉唆了!
...was the reason that...可以直接用because或since來表達因果關係就好啦
不需要寫4個字來表達因果

(E)(Being)Very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight, Charles Lindbergh
句首省略Being
如果補上就是分詞結構
表示伴隨的情況
邏輯主詞也沒有亂移轉(就是Charles Lindbergh)
跟(D)比起來簡潔多了

[chencraig0227]

同意(E)應該只是省略being的分詞結構，不是甚麼獨立構句。

在來..! (D)的句構我認為沒有問題...但是真的挺囉嗦的...akward.