mikelee \$m[1]:維尼 \$m[1]:
我覺得 1 2 除非 for use 有什麼其他的解釋
不然 for ... to V... 都是表目的和用途 -> redundancy
According to above explanation,could you tell us what's different between option 1&2 and option 3?
If your explanation is right, in my opnion I think to V~to ~ is also redundant.
discuss more....![]()
To汪汪北鼻
What's this answer???
我瞭解你的意思了
對於 1 2 我的解釋是將 for ... to V... 都認為是修飾 distribute
所以是 redundancy
對於 3 4 卻又把 to use something to V 後面的不定詞認為是修飾 use
應該是太偏心了 :P
擺明想把 1 2 兩個選項置於死地

感謝你~