Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [討論]GWD 8-20

[討論]GWD 8-20

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

文章agk99 » 2004-11-24 02:15

OG #125
The winds that howl across the Great Plains not only blow away valuable topsoil, thereby reducing the potential crop yield of a tract of land, and also damage or destroy young plants.

(A) and also damage or destroy
(B) as well as damaging or destroying
(C) but they also cause damage or destroy
(D) but also damage or destroy
(E) but also causing damage or destroying

Choice D, the best answer, correctly employs the correlative construction not only x but also y, where x and y are grammatically parallel and where both x and y (damage and destroy) apply to young plants. Choices A, (not only... and also), B (not only... as well as), and C (not only... but they also) violate the not only... but also paradigm. Moreover, B contains terms (blow... damaging) that are not parallel. In C and E, damage is used not as a verb with young plants as its direct object but as a noun receiving the action of cause; consequently, these choices fail to state explicitly that the damage is done to young plants. E also violates parallelism (not only blow... but also causing).

OG 這本bible又讓我挖到寶
如上所述,not only.. but also...正常情況下還真不能分開
至於有沒有關於also可省的,請繼續討論
agk99
超級版主
超級版主
 
文章: 3109
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 22:12
來自: Shenzhen, China

文章 » 2004-11-24 06:57

agk99 \$m[1]:OG #125

Choice D, the best answer, correctly employs the correlative construction not only x but also y, where x and y are grammatically parallel and where both x and y (damage and destroy) apply to young plants. Choices A, (not only... and also), B (not only... as well as), and C (not only... but they also) violate the not only... but also paradigm. Moreover, B contains terms (blow... damaging) that are not parallel. In C and E, damage is used not as a verb with young plants as its direct object but as a noun receiving the action of cause; consequently, these choices fail to state explicitly that the damage is done to young plants. E also violates parallelism (not only blow... but also causing).

OG 這本bible又讓我挖到寶
如上所述,not only.. but also...正常情況下還真不能分開
至於有沒有關於also可省的,請繼續討論


謝謝大哥 , 這就是我再第二樓13號房說滴 OG上堅稱這是長安公主與小霸王情比金堅二人組的組合....不過 :^) .不是前面已經有莫北北代表拍案論定了嗎 :^)
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章agk99 » 2004-11-27 00:03

73. “Fast cycle time” is a strategy of designing a manufacturing organization to eliminate bottlenecks and delays in production. Not only does it speed up production, but it also assures quality. The reason is that the bottlenecks and delays cannot be eliminated unless all work is done right the first time.

Not only does it speed up production, but it also assures quality.

這是OG CR中的一句話,放在這給大家參考
agk99
超級版主
超級版主
 
文章: 3109
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 22:12
來自: Shenzhen, China

文章odinhsu » 2005-01-19 13:52

這題的答案究竟是???
你要阿,你想要我會給你的,你想要我不會不給你的,不會你想要我不給你,你不想要我卻偏偏要給你,大家講道理嘛~~~
頭像
odinhsu
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 141
註冊時間: 2004-12-11 00:30

文章odinhsu » 2005-01-19 14:08

agk99 \$m[1]:OG #125
The winds that howl across the Great Plains not only blow away valuable topsoil, thereby reducing the potential crop yield of a tract of land, and also damage or destroy young plants.

(A) and also damage or destroy
(B) as well as damaging or destroying
(C) but they also cause damage or destroy
(D) but also damage or destroy
(E) but also causing damage or destroying

Choice D, the best answer, correctly employs the correlative construction not only x but also y, where x and y are grammatically parallel and where both x and y (damage and destroy) apply to young plants. Choices A, (not only... and also), B (not only... as well as), and C (not only... but they also) violate the not only... but also paradigm. Moreover, B contains terms (blow... damaging) that are not parallel. In C and E, damage is used not as a verb with young plants as its direct object but as a noun receiving the action of cause; consequently, these choices fail to state explicitly that the damage is done to young plants. E also violates parallelism (not only blow... but also causing).

OG 這本bible又讓我挖到寶
如上所述,not only.. but also...正常情況下還真不能分開
至於有沒有關於also可省的,請繼續討論

報告大哥....我覺得它講的不是but also不能分開..
我覺得它說的是 not only + V but also也應該要加V
而不是 S+V
你要阿,你想要我會給你的,你想要我不會不給你的,不會你想要我不給你,你不想要我卻偏偏要給你,大家講道理嘛~~~
頭像
odinhsu
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 141
註冊時間: 2004-12-11 00:30

文章davidlee0222 » 2005-01-20 12:03

小弟目前為止沒看過半題
歐雞說跟not only..but also長的不一樣
有哪題是對的
只要不是長這樣都錯
完全沒有考慮餘地

AGK大大真是細心哪
還有詹姆士大大
為什麼你們找歐雞詳解可以這麼快又準呢??
實在是太神奇了~
davidlee0222
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 3017
註冊時間: 2004-12-14 19:54

文章odinhsu » 2005-01-21 07:39

In 1978 a national study found that not only had many contractors licensed by a self-policing private guild failed to pass qualifying exams, they in addition falsified their references.
(A) they in addition falsified their references
(B) they had their references falsified in addition
(C) but they had also falsified their references
(D) they had also falsified their references
(E) but their references were falsified as well.....(C)

The skill and the precision of the Anasazi, ancient inhabitants of the Southwest, in measuring the movements of the Sun and Moon is evidenced not only at Chaco Canyon but at a number of other sites.
(A) in measuring the movements of the Sun and Moon is evidenced not only at
(B) in measuring the movements of the Sun and Moon are evidenced not only at
(C) in measuring the movements of the Sun and Moon is evidenced at not only
(D) to measure the movements of the Sun and Moon is evidenced at not only
(E) to measure the movements of the Sun and Moon are evidenced not only at
.....(B)

以上兩個例子是SC 大全裡的...如莫北北說的also是可以省略的
你要阿,你想要我會給你的,你想要我不會不給你的,不會你想要我不給你,你不想要我卻偏偏要給你,大家講道理嘛~~~
頭像
odinhsu
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 141
註冊時間: 2004-12-11 00:30

文章Calvin » 2005-01-23 12:45

In the idiom "not only.... but also....", also can be omited in ordinary usage, but OG prefers " not only...but also..." to " not only....but " . OG regards " not only...but.." as being unidiomatic. You can see a lot of examples in OG's explanation.

BTW, please clearify this : Not only V + S, but S also....

S cannot be omitted in this condition. Also, u can find the example in OG.

FYI.
頭像
Calvin
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1155
註冊時間: 2004-12-28 02:46

文章reohuang » 2005-01-28 20:36

I agree with Calvin

如果是blablabla not only V1 ... but also V2...這種狀況應該是idiomatic的標準用法(V1 V2應該可以依題目內容調整為N1 N2...就是要對稱就是了)
的確這種idiomatic的情況下好像also是不能省略的

但是如果not only倒裝用法提前的話
Not only do + S + V..., but S also V....
這邊的not only ... but also...應該對稱的就變成是兩個子句
所以but also裡的主詞S應該就不能省
S能出現的地方也變成只有but跟also的中間了

所以
a)錯在gave (it應該沒問題)
b)錯在which以及but also句子沒有主詞
c)run-on
e)not only V1...應該接but also V2...but also沒有also也多了it

看起來d)變成正確選項了
不是not only...but also的idiom
單純的語氣轉折but

請教各位的意見~
頭像
reohuang
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 305
註冊時間: 2004-11-23 01:44

文章cocaine » 2005-01-31 22:17

agree D
努力,才有甜蜜的果實
頭像
cocaine
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 502
註冊時間: 2004-12-23 23:53
來自: Mar

文章best555tw » 2005-04-20 21:25

我也覺得D

(B)farmland gave consumers relatively
inexpensive houses and furniture
滿詭異的
Make a decision and move on.
best555tw
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 430
註冊時間: 2005-03-26 21:13
來自: Taipei

文章世界和平 » 2005-05-25 15:16

請教各位前輩,GWD8-20的結論是D囉??
頭像
世界和平
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 191
註冊時間: 2005-03-21 22:10
來自: Taipei

文章jacob » 2005-05-26 00:09

補充ㄧ下,答案C中 "The systematic...United States,..."逗號前這部分跳過逗號中的修飾語往後找根本沒動詞,也就是沒完成的句子,我想也是錯誤之一.

看過上面大大們找出的其他選項錯誤之外,
我覺得從句意上來說也應該是D比較適合,
not only A but also B 當中 A,B兩者是不是應該"同向"的概念比較合邏輯,
因為意思是" 不只...而且..."
本題creat farmland and give inexpensive houses 是好處,
但cause erosion and deforest whole regions 是壞處,
覺得是反向的概念, 若使用not only A but also B 覺得很不合邏輯 *-)
用轉折的語氣會比較合適吧.

個人的想法 ;CC
jacob
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 13
註冊時間: 2005-05-15 18:07
來自: 遠方

文章Pavis » 2005-06-14 01:00

魚 寫到:

就像我之前回你的一樣樣
A要真有錯,恐怕就是那個gave吧
因為就句意來說,雖然AB不同,但猛一看好像都可以接受耶


但事實上...gave並沒有錯吧...!!!
本來就都要用過去簡單式
只是前面因為Not only倒裝出現did
所以created才變回原形的
有沒有人注意到題目下面的Note?
管衛東說 The answer should be "A" on the condition of " it but also"

不過我還是無法決定A或D...sigh
Pavis
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 62
註冊時間: 2005-05-25 22:21

文章STELLA-COR » 2005-06-26 17:05

可是 選項D裡面 沒有not only耶
but also應該不能單獨存在吧~~
STELLA-COR
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 9
註冊時間: 2005-04-05 00:28

上一頁下一頁

回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 7 位訪客