23. A recent New York Times editorial criticized the city’s election board for, first of all, failing to replace outmoded voting machines prone to breakdowns, and secondarily, for their failure to investigate allegations of corruption involving board members.
(A) secondarily, for their failure to
(B) secondly, for their failure to
(C) secondly, that they failed and did not
(D) second, that they failed to
(E) second, for failing to
Ans: E
從they與their的代名詞指涉不清, 即可排除ABCD,
我的問題是, E選項中的"for",似乎有點多餘??
因為前面已經有critisized ....for, 這邊又一個for??
這樣不會很怪嗎?
有人可以幫忙解釋的嗎? Thx!