[問題]OG67

[trinahuang]

OG67
Congress is debating a bill requiring certain employers probide workers with unpaid leave so as to care for sick or newborn children.
A.provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
B.to provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
C.provide workers with unpaid leave in order that they
D.to provide workers with unpaid leave so that they can
E.provide workers with unpaid leave and

OG上說Choice A,C, and E are ungrammatical because, in this context, requiring...employers must be followed by an infinitive. These options display additional faults:in A, so as to fails to specify that the workers receiving the leave wil be the people caring for the infants and children;in order that they, as used in C, is imprecise and unidiomatic;and E says that the bill being debated would require the employersthemselves to care for the children. Choice B offers the correct infinitive, to provide,but contains the faulty so as to. Choice D is best.

A中，我不是很瞭解so as to 的用法，而且不是本來就是那些拿到假的workers要照顧小孩嗎？
謝謝！

對不起....
我沒注意到我沒PO到解答...
對不起
謝謝提醒我.......

[Behemoth]

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=157

感謝您~

[trinahuang]

謝謝提醒我
我已經補上了.......
謝謝

[trinahuang]

謝謝提醒我
我已經補上了.......
謝謝
這樣對嗎？
謝謝.....

[hungji]

決選 B,D (require A to V....)
選 B 改變句意, 變成雇主照顧員工
選 D, D 對了

[fiona]

D.to provide workers with unpaid leave so that they can
想請問這裡的they為什麼不會有指代empolyers or workers的問題呀

[haijung]

是阿, 今天複習到這一題也有和樓上同學一樣的問題~

(B)的so as to會有指代不清的問題, 即, 不知道是employers還是workers照顧孩子

那麼

(D)的they不會產生一樣的問題嘛? 因為employers和workers在這裡也都是複數耶~

哪位好心的大大可以幫忙解釋嘛? 感激~~

[negrogato.tw]

請問 一樓有問到so as to 的用法，那裡有人有說明嗎?
我不太懂... 意思是說so as to 不能清楚表達修飾的對象 而 so that 則明顯的修飾前面提的放假這件事使workers 可以去care for..嗎?

[brokenenglish]

請問 一樓有問到so as to 的用法，那裡有人有說明嗎?
我不太懂... 意思是說so as to 不能清楚表達修飾的對象 而 so that 則明顯的修飾前面提的放假這件事使workers 可以去care for..嗎?

push!

[frozenrain]

so as to 前後句的主詞必須一致
(據說 so as to 連用的選項沒有正確過)
故 (B)有文法上的問題
(D)可能會產生多重指稱的問題沒錯 算是有瑕疵的答案吧

[cacao]

是阿, 今天複習到這一題也有和樓上同學一樣的問題~

(B)的so as to會有指代不清的問題, 即, 不知道是employers還是workers照顧孩子

那麼

(D)的they不會產生一樣的問題嘛? 因為employers和workers在這裡也都是複數耶~

哪位好心的大大可以幫忙解釋嘛? 感激~~

因為so as to是前後主詞一致，所以a和b選項會直接讓句意變成是employers照顧孩子

而d選項中的they 也許會有指，但比起其它選項文法上的大錯誤，相對而言d選項只是會有點句意上未百分之百的清楚
有時 是要從五個選項中選出相對好的答案

[hccill]

請問一下,

選項(D)中, 為何so that 之後為何是they can?而不是they could?

謝謝!

[swiss0204]

我的感覺是,
OG 裡, 主句"現在式/現進式 "所引導出的句子應該也是
"現在式/現進式" 或是"未來式".

有錯請指正.......

[raymangg]

而d選項中的they 也許會有指，但比起其它選項文法上的大錯誤，相對而言d選項只是會有點句意上未百分之百的清楚
有時 是要從五個選項中選出相對好的答案

同意


參考一下GWD11-10

viewtopic.php?f=11&t=2093

正確答案跟這一題有同樣的小瑕疵 , 雖然代名詞有一個以上的可能指代對象

但是句意不會混淆的情況下 , 還是可以選

[dibert8]

看到require,但是沒有that,所以是不定詞結構=>(B) (D)選一個; (B) so as to的主詞是employers,句意不合邏輯(應是workers照顧自己的小孩,不是雇主) => 選(D)