Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - Prep-t2 Essay5

Prep-t2 Essay5

GMAT 考的是閱讀....閱讀....還是閱讀....

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

Prep-t2 Essay5

文章Huang Hsin-Yi » 2008-01-14 17:26

Essay #5. 189 (21953-!-item-!-188;#058&00189-00)

Traditional social science models of class groups in the United States are based on economic status and assume that women's economic status derives from association with men, typically fathers or husbands, and that women therefore have more compelling common interest with men of their own economic class than with women outside it. Some feminist social scientists, by contrast, have argued that the basic division in American society is instead based on gender, and that the total female population, regardless of economic status, constitutes a distinct class. 應該是在這定位對不? Social historian Mary Ryan, for example, has argued that in early-nineteenth-century America the identical legal status of working-class and middle-class free women outweighed the differences between women of these two classes: married women, regardless of their family's wealth, did essentially the same unpaid domestic work, and none could own property or vote.


Recently, though, other feminist analysts have questioned this model, examining ways in which the condition of working-class women differs from that of middle-class women as well as from that of working-class men. Ann Oakley notes, for example, that the gap between women of different economic classes widened in the late nineteenth century: most working-class women, who performed wage labor outside the home, were excluded from the emerging middle-class ideal of femininity centered around domesticity and volunteerism.


Question #18. 189-05 (22091-!-item-!-188;#058&000189-05)

Which of the following statements best characterizes the relationship between traditional social science models of class and Ryan's model, as described in the passage?

(A) Ryan's model differs from the traditional model by making gender, rather than economic status, the determinant of women's class status.
(B) The traditional social science model of class differs from Ryan's in its assumption that women are financially dependent on men.
(C) Ryan's model of class and the traditional social science model both assume that women work, either within the home or for pay.
(D) The traditional social science model of class differs from Ryan's in that each model focuses on a different period of American history.
(E) Both Ryan's model of class and the traditional model consider multiple factors, including wealth, marital status, and enfranchisement, in determining women's status.

答案:A
看不是很懂A
也不知道B錯在那 ;-$
Huang Hsin-Yi
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1038
註冊時間: 2007-08-17 00:41
來自: Tainan

文章小花 » 2008-01-14 22:51

我也覺得頗怪的

待大牛鼎力相助
小花
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 392
註冊時間: 2007-08-23 14:59

文章a-jan » 2008-01-15 00:41

me 不是牛人.....或是請其它的牛人來繼續補充

可以參考這裡,有人分析了文章
http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopi ... nce+models

這題考inference, 定位在 for example 前後上下句的context
Traditional social science models is based on economic status , 而 feminist scocial scientists 認為是 by gender , 兩者立場不一樣
而Ryan 是與 feminist scocial scientists 立場相同
(A)是個比較適合的答案
a-jan
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 57
註冊時間: 2006-12-13 20:54

文章Huang Hsin-Yi » 2008-01-15 09:05

Some feminist social scientists, by contrast, have argued that the basic division in American society is instead based on gender, and that the total female population, regardless of economic status, constitutes a distinct class.

我想應該還是by contrast之後的紅色部份解釋了A選項

前紅色說 feminist 用based on gender代替
後紅色說不論經濟地位如何

而B 並不是by contrast 之後的內容

不知大家覺得如何?
Huang Hsin-Yi
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1038
註冊時間: 2007-08-17 00:41
來自: Tainan


回到 GMAT Reading Comprehension 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 4 位訪客