kikisky \$m[1]:如果說是表新舊contrast的文章架構的話
那麼
new scholarship 所反對的就會是long-held view
new scholarship 所主張的就會是和long-held view相反的觀念
所以~
Recent feminist scholarship con-
cerning the United States in the 1920’s
challenges earlier interpretations that
Line assessed the twenties in terms of the
(5) unkept “promises” of the women’s
suffrage movement. This new scholar-
ship disputes the long-held view that
because a women’s voting bloc did not
materialize after women gained the right
(10) to vote in 1920, suffrage failed to
produce long-term political gains for
women. These feminist scholars also
challenge the old view that pronounced
suffrage a failure for not delivering on
(15) the promise that the women’s vote
would bring about moral, corruption-
free governance. Asked whether
women’s suffrage was a failure, these
s cholars cite the words of turn-of-the-
(20) century social reformer Jane Addams,
“Why don’t you ask if suffrage in
general is failing?”
所以~
應該可以明顯看出
old view認為是failure
而new scholarship 是相反的立場=也就是不認為是failure
希望有幫到你^ ^
喔...原來是這樣
:D
現在我瞭解了
kiki 謝謝妳 ;)