[問題]閱讀文章時如何判斷的作者態度...

由 **bonus** » 2006-10-11 22:04

請教各位牛人與AT前輩
在閱讀文章時
如何判斷哪句是作者說的
跟作者的態度如何
有什麼技巧嗎？？？
謝謝
;-S

由 **davidlee0222** » 2006-10-13 01:38

會看到文句中作者突然冒出一兩句自己的話
或是會用明顯的支持或反對形容詞
有時候作者會見風轉舵
不過就劃一下箭頭
看各段鍾是怎麼轉正反的
不會很難

由 **bonus** » 2006-10-20 21:06

謝謝大衛的指導
目前正試著
按大衛教的引子
找出來

由 **bonus** » 2006-10-21 13:06

再次請教
evaluate
與
analyze
有何差別
當同時都是選項答案時
要如何去分？？？

由 **davidlee0222** » 2006-10-22 17:28

when talking about evaluating
there's a scale system to determine if the subject is qualified or not
or a good/bad, right/wrong answer
or even a ranking, how good or how bad this entity is
the MBA ranking is a typical evaluation
or your grades such as GPA
your professors "eveluate" if you're qualified or not
and also how good or how bad you did in your academy

on the other hand
analysis is to observe and examinate deep inside the subject
to analyze details or relationship internally or externally
but there's no good or bad in analysis
nither how good or how bad is the subject
only how these stuff are made of
or how these are connected or disconnected

由 **bonus** » 2006-10-22 23:15

謝謝大衛精闢的回覆
真的是替我解決了
存在已久的疑惑
;yes;

再次請教
那criticize與question
的差別是否在於
criticize有加入個人的態度想法？？？
而question只針對被引述的人
的話, 研究, 或作品等等
提出地方質疑
沒有個人觀點加入？？？

由 **bonus** » 2006-10-23 11:57

davidlee0222 \$m[1]:when talking about evaluating
there's a scale system to determine if the subject is qualified or not
or a good/bad, right/wrong answer
or even a ranking, how good or how bad this entity is
the MBA ranking is a typical evaluation
or your grades such as GPA
your professors "eveluate" if you're qualified or not
and also how good or how bad you did in your academy

on the other hand
analysis is to observe and examinate deep inside the subject
to analyze details or relationship internally or externally
but there's no good or bad in analysis
nither how good or how bad is the subject
only how these stuff are made of
or how these are connected or disconnected

請教大衛
關於英文字義的瞭解
如上大衛所解釋
是如何做到
英英字典也沒有這樣的解釋
要如何練就出來？？？

由 **davidlee0222** » 2006-10-24 08:35

criticize is to pick flaws from perfect level
you criticize stuff that is not perfect
and yes, criticize is definitely personal opinion
there's a group of people criticize particular subjects as their jobs everyday
they are "critics"
most of them are professionals

question is to challenge the feasibility
questioning if the entity can work or not
or challenging if someone is right or wrong
it'll be a yes/no question
such as: yes, it's feasible and you're right
or: no, it won't work and you're wrong

the CR and RC in GMAT are good trainings
and also "Research Methodology" subject in academy
it's literally called "Logic"
it's a formal subject in Philosophy Department in college
you can find some textbooks about this

read large amount of analytical perioticals regularly
also think and analysis by yourself
make these two become your habits
through your own analyzing practise
your analytical skills will get more and more sophisticated
your "resolution" on examining issues will become more detail and precise
discuss with others will also make your thoughts more clear through debating
MBA program also offer lots of analytical assignments and group projects that you'll improve through these cross-training process

由 **bonus** » 2006-10-24 10:06

謝謝大衛的指導與經驗分享
我會努力試著去做到
;yes;

由 **bonus** » 2006-12-22 14:07

請教大衛
關於作者態度上
"question"與"challenge"
兩者的差別
要如何去區分？？？

由 **bonus** » 2007-01-15 22:15

Up ~ 頂

[問題]閱讀文章時如何判斷的作者態度...

[問題]閱讀文章時如何判斷的作者態度...

誰在線上