[問題]GWD31 Q19

[hccill]

Sonya: The government of Copeland is raising the cigarette tax. Copeland’s cigarette prices will still be reasonably low, so cigarette consumption will probably not be affected much. Consequently, government revenue from the tax will increase.

Raoul: True, smoking is unlikely to decrease, because Copeland’s cigarette prices will still not be high. They will, however, no longer be the lowest in the region, so we might begin to see substantial illegal sales of smuggled cigarettes in Copeland.

Raoul responds to Sonya’s argument by doing which of the following?

A: Questioning the support for Sonya’s conclusion by distinguishing carefully between No change and no decrease
B: calling Sonya’s conclusion into question by pointing to a possible effect of a certain change.
C: Arguing that Sonya’s conclusion would be better supported if Sonya could cite a precedent for what she predicts will happen.
D: showing that a cause that Sonya claims will be producing a certain effect is not the only cause that could produce that effect
E: pointing out that a certain initiative is not bold enough to have the predicts it will have

答案給E,可是我覺得B比較好耶~
想請問各位大大的看法如何?
謝謝~

[chour]

我手邊的解答說是B,我也覺得B不賴啊!

[Chris1]

我的答案也是E,
但是我是選B,
CD上的討論也是一致認為是B,
我轉貼一下CD上的解釋,
------------------------------------------------------------
From: http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp ... 596&skin=0

A. 肯定错。通篇都没有看见"no change"
B. 我选这个。香烟价格的上升导致非法香烟的流入因此政府税收不一定会增加
C. 完全不相干
D. 不对。Raoul没有指出税收上升或者吸烟人数不下降的另外一个原因，他指出的是税率上升的另外一个结果
E. 傻的都知道不对

[fsab00037748]

我在沒看任何討論前 應該會選B
B很好哇...順順的...長得就像ETS正確答案look :P

這個CDer的 " E:傻的都知道不对" 還真是個另類的排除法 Ccc...