[問題]CR大全10-11

[Chris1]

Less than 50 percent of a certain tropical country’s wildlands remains intact. Efforts are under way to restore biological diversity in that country by restoring some destroyed wild habitats and extending some relatively intact portions of forests. However, opponents argue that these efforts are not needed because there is still plenty of wildland left.

Which of the following, if true, most significantly weakens the argument of the opponents of conservation efforts?

(A) As much, if not more, effort is required to restore a wild habitat as to preserve an intact habitat.
(B) The opponents of restoration efforts are, for the most part, members of the wealthier classes in their own villages and cities.
(C) Existing conservation laws have been very effective in preserving biological diversity within the wildlands that remain intact.
(D) For many tropical species native to that country, the tropical wildlands that are still relatively intact do not provide appropriate habitats for reproduction.
(E) If a suitable population of plants and animals is introduced and is permitted to disperse and grow, tropical habitats can most certainly be restored.

答案: D

這題的題目是在問什麼呢??
是在weaken反對conservation efforts的人,
還是在weaken支持conservation efforts的人呢??
D選項,我的理解是: 仍然相當完整的tropical wildlands不會提供適當的habitats給予再生
E選項,我的理解是: 假使一個適當數量的plants and animals被引進,而且可以擴大生長,tropical habitats就能夠restored

所以以我的理解,
D選項是在weaken支持conservation efforts的人,
E選項是在weaken反對conservation efforts的人,
我是選了E,
因為我以為題目的"weakens the argument of the opponents of conservation efforts",
是在說"削弱反對conservation efforts的論述",
不知道我的理解哪裡出了差錯???
麻煩各位幫我離清一下~~~
謝謝各位 ^^

[fsab00037748]

題目在問要如何 weaken "反對環境保育者"

說不用環境保育的人認為wildland還很多,
所以不需要restore destroyed wild habitats and extend intact forests;


現在我們要去說"反對環境保育者"的論點是錯的,
環境是需要restore destroyed wildland和extend intact forests;
那為什麼未受破壞的土地還很多的狀況下, 還需要環境保育呢?
答案D:因為許多在地生物, 在未受破壞的環境下還是無法獲得好的棲息地繁殖;
因此表示 反對環境保育者是錯的, 成功weaken!

而答案E在題目的因果關係中虛晃了一下,
看似支持環境保育者,
但並沒有weaken掉題目 "現在還有很多未受破壞的土地, 所以不需環境保育"

[Chris1]

謝謝fsab00037748小姐的精闢開釋!!!
過了幾天再回頭看這題目,發現,
原來我把原文給誤解了......
最後一個句子"opponents argue that these efforts are not needed because there is still plenty of wildland left."
我誤解為"反對者認為,這些efforts是不需要的,因為仍然有很多wildland會離開"......
我大概是那時候中猴吧......(閱讀能力太重要了!!!)
正確的就是fsab00037748小姐說的"反對者認為,這些efforts是不需要的,因為wildland還有很多",
所以選項D正中下懷!!!
再次感謝fsab00037748小姐 ^^

[fsab00037748]

嗯嗯 一起加油啦^^