[問題]大全3-20

[Alycia]

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.
When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.
Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?
(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.
(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.
(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.
(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.
(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

I guess I dont quite understand what this question is asking...does it ask which answer most accurately rephrases the proposal??

[evelight]

本帖重複
http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=7444

發問前請先進置頂帖<CR討論匯總>
找到你要問的類別, ex: 大全、天山、GWD...
再點進去看有沒有你想問的題號

問過的題目請再勿開新帖
於原帖內直接回覆即可
謝謝合作