Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - TTGWD4-Q14 新題喔~

TTGWD4-Q14 新題喔~

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

TTGWD4-Q14 新題喔~

文章fsab00037748 » 2006-11-06 20:09

Q14:
Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument?

The attribution of the choral work Lacrimae to the composer Pescard (1400 – 1474) has been regarded as tentative, since it was based on a single treatise from the early 1500’s that named Pescard as the composer. Recently, several musical treatises from the late 1500’s have come to light, all of which name Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae. Unfortunately, these newly discovered treatises lend no support to the attribution of Lacrimae to Pescard, since _______.

A.the treatise from the early 1500’s misidentifies the composers of some of the musical works it considers
B.the author of the treatise from the early 1500’s had no very strong evidence on which to base the identification of Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae
C.there are works that can conclusively be attributed to Pescard that are not even mentioned in the treatise from the early 1500’s
D.the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier treatise
E.no known treatises from the 1600’s identify Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae


答案給D

請問這題是怎麼解的呢?
AB看起來也都蠻logical的說
頭像
fsab00037748
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 156
註冊時間: 2006-02-17 13:30

文章toycha » 2007-04-19 17:46

我是這樣想的 不知道對不對就是了

T=treatise(論文??)

題目說:不幸的是,新發現的T沒有辦法支持"the attribution of L to P"這件事

newly discover=T from the late 1500's

答案A:討論early 1500's(x) 無相關 應該要討論的是late 1500's

答案B:同上皆為無相關

答案D:later T 來路不明,但early的T是真貨(來路不明故無法支持證實,好答案!)
toycha
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 15
註冊時間: 2007-02-06 10:56

文章christinehsu » 2007-04-20 02:14

不好意思! 第一次提出想法 如果有不對的 麻煩糾正我啦 :)

題目是敘述: 會將L歸類成P的基礎因為是建立在單一的論文上,所以這種歸類被視為是暫時的。最近許多的1500's 晚期的音樂論文(針對所有被歸類為P的L)漸漸浮現在台面上{這句有點不知道怎翻}。這些新發現的論文中,不幸的指出,不可以同樣將L被歸類為P,原因為_________

答案: ( 我的作法是排除法)
A: 我也認為討論對象不同 所以先排出
B:本來這個論點就不是被一個強而有利的證據所支持著,所以作者的論文 也不必須要be supported by a very strong evdience.
C:對於之前被歸類為P再進一步討論( 沒有必要)
E:討論對象不同。

D: 晚期的作品,不像早期一樣有依據可以被歸類。

不好意思 雖然我覺得自己的解釋有點怪,但是希望能藉由提出意見,來釐清自己的思考的方向。請大家多多包含 :PP
christinehsu
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 94
註冊時間: 2004-10-23 00:26

文章dibert8 » 2007-04-20 04:58

這題考辨證的對象,關鍵族群在 newly discovered treatises -- from the late 1500’s
(A) (B) (C) the treatise from the early 1500’s => 對象錯誤
(E) treatises from the 1600’s => 對象錯誤
=> (D) the later treatises = newly discovered treatises
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 5 位訪客

cron