Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]天山4-28

[問題]天山4-28

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]天山4-28

文章Janet » 2005-11-12 16:22

Q28:
In Berinia, the age at which people could begin to drink alcohol legally used to be 18. In 1990, in an attempt to reduce alcohol consumption and thereby to reduce alcohol-related traffic deaths among Berinians under 21, the legal drinking age was raised to 21. Alcohol-related traffic deaths among people under 21 have decreased significantly since 1990. Nevertheless, surveys show that people in that age-group drink just as much
alcohol as they did before 1990. Which of the following, if true of Berinia, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy?
A. For the population as a whole, annual alcohol consumption is no lower now than it was in 1990.
B. Alcohol consumption away from home, for example in bars and restaurants, is much lower among people under 21 than it was in 1990.
C. The proportion of people under 21 who own a car is higher now than it was in 1990.
D. Alcohol consumption is lower among people under 21 than among adults in most other age-groups.
E. Alcohol-related traffic deaths among people over 21 have increased slightly since 1990.

ans:B

真糟糕所有的答案我都不覺得好,請問B為何對呢?
熱情優雅百分百的Janet
Janet
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 136
註冊時間: 2005-08-04 21:50

文章fiona » 2005-11-13 02:09

禁酒令提升至21歲 21歲死亡車禍少 但21歲以下銷量並未減少
WHYWHYWHY

前兩個敘述看來似乎禁酒令有收到效果 可是最後又說沒有減少
所以B選項提供了解釋說 21歲以下的人 去酒吧喝的銷量大大減少了 (也許都偷偷躲在家裡喝) 所以交通意外也減少

請繼續討論喔 我覺得我好像講的有點混亂
頭像
fiona
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 344
註冊時間: 2005-05-27 08:36

Re: [問題]天山4-28

文章peche » 2005-11-14 15:16

Janet \$m[1]:Q28:
In Berinia, the age at which people could begin to drink alcohol legally used to be 18. In 1990, in an attempt to reduce alcohol consumption and thereby to reduce alcohol-related traffic deaths among Berinians under 21, the legal drinking age was raised to 21. Alcohol-related traffic deaths among people under 21 have decreased significantly since 1990. Nevertheless, surveys show that people in that age-group drink just as much
alcohol as they did before 1990. Which of the following, if true of Berinia, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy?
A. For the population as a whole, annual alcohol consumption is no lower now than it was in 1990.
B. Alcohol consumption away from home, for example in bars and restaurants, is much lower among people under 21 than it was in 1990.
C. The proportion of people under 21 who own a car is higher now than it was in 1990.
D. Alcohol consumption is lower among people under 21 than among adults in most other age-groups.
E. Alcohol-related traffic deaths among people over 21 have increased slightly since 1990.

ans:B

真糟糕所有的答案我都不覺得好,請問B為何對呢?


A)"For the population as a whole" 既然題目已經鎖定特定族群(那些年輕酒鬼) population as whole 就是廢話

b) 其實大家還是依樣喝 但不出們不用開車~ 所以減少酒駕意外的發生
C) weaken : if more people own a car, more accidents are expected to happen --> 对結論火上加油 解釋不了~~

D) contradict the passage's
"group drink just as much alcohol as they did before 1990. "

E) like D) against the passage's:
Alcohol-related traffic deaths among people under 21 have decreased significantly since 1990.
頭像
peche
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 123
註冊時間: 2005-06-20 16:21

Re: [問題]天山4-28

文章Janet » 2005-11-14 19:52

peche \$m[1]:
Janet \$m[1]:Q28:
In Berinia, the age at which people could begin to drink alcohol legally used to be 18. In 1990, in an attempt to reduce alcohol consumption and thereby to reduce alcohol-related traffic deaths among Berinians under 21, the legal drinking age was raised to 21. Alcohol-related traffic deaths among people under 21 have decreased significantly since 1990. Nevertheless, surveys show that people in that age-group drink just as much
alcohol as they did before 1990. Which of the following, if true of Berinia, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy?
A. For the population as a whole, annual alcohol consumption is no lower now than it was in 1990.
B. Alcohol consumption away from home, for example in bars and restaurants, is much lower among people under 21 than it was in 1990.
C. The proportion of people under 21 who own a car is higher now than it was in 1990.
D. Alcohol consumption is lower among people under 21 than among adults in most other age-groups.
E. Alcohol-related traffic deaths among people over 21 have increased slightly since 1990.

ans:B

真糟糕所有的答案我都不覺得好,請問B為何對呢?


A)"For the population as a whole" 既然題目已經鎖定特定族群(那些年輕酒鬼) population as whole 就是廢話

b) 其實大家還是依樣喝 但不出們不用開車~ 所以減少酒駕意外的發生
C) weaken : if more people own a car, more accidents are expected to happen --> 对結論火上加油 解釋不了~~

D) contradict the passage's
"group drink just as much alcohol as they did before 1990. "

E) like D) against the passage's:
Alcohol-related traffic deaths among people under 21 have decreased significantly since 1990.


E是個非常好騙人的選項.而且注意他不是against the passage

E. Alcohol-related traffic deaths among people over 21 have increased slightly since 1990.

我之前就想成那個年齡的人長大了(超過21歲).畢竟1990是很久以前了!
熱情優雅百分百的Janet
Janet
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 136
註冊時間: 2005-08-04 21:50


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 8 位訪客

cron