Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 查看主题 - og11th 101

og11th 101

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

og11th 101

帖子vicky1986 » 2007-11-18 12:53

For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed、a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria’s ports is necessary to an embargo、but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo.

The claims above、if true、most strongly support which of the following conclusions?

(A) The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.
(B) As long as international opinion is unanimously against Patria、a trade embargo is likely to succeed.
(C) A naval blockade of Patria’s ports would ensure that no goods enter or leave Patria.
(D) Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail at some time.
(E) For a blockade of Patria’s ports to be successful、international opinion must be unanimous.
答案是d
我想要問的是b選項
為什麼錯呢? As long as international opinion is unanimously against Patria、a trade embargo is likely to succeed
這句話從上文推下來沒有錯阿
解答上是說the conclusion contradicts the given information and so it is not justified. 是說因為他的前提假設跟題目相反所以不能選ㄇ

但是我記得有一題og 11th 51題
Biometric access-control systems-those using fingerprints、voiceprints、and so forth、to regulate admittance to restricted areas-work by degrees of similarity、not by identity. After all、even the same finger will rarely leave exactly identical prints. Such systems can be adjusted to minimize refusals of access to legitimate access-seekers. Such adjustments、however、increase the likelihood of admitting impostors.

Which of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by the information above?

B.if a Biometric access-control system reliably prevents impostors from being admitted、it will sometimes turn away legitimate access-seekers.
他的conclusion的答案也是跟原題的假設相反阿
我有點搞糊塗了
拜託各位牛人幫幫我阿
我每次遇到這題就搞糊塗
快要考試啦>"<
vicky1986
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 23
注册: 2007-07-12 18:17

帖子阿琪 » 2007-11-18 13:50

不是牛人…但參考看看喔!

回答 "上述文章, if true, most strongly support " 的問題時,就是要去瞭解題目的整體意思,答案跟題目最相符的即可!

OG101
題目為 trade embargo 要成功,要有兩要件:
1、a high degree of both international accord
2、ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained
Patria’s ports 完全封鎖,達到第2個條件,可是沒符合要件1(cause international discord )

所以,答案就是(d)-->一定失敗!!
(b)破壞了題目 ,自行增加一個例外(unanimously against),然後說也能成功!!(這不符合題目所述的內容)

OG51
思路主軸:adjusted to minimize refusals of access本人 ,會增加likelihood of admitting impostors
所以 (b)符合題目的意思,如果避免impostor,那就會refusal (turn away)本人囉!

以上參考○魯!!
-------Vision;Passion; Determination; Persistence; Innovation-------
头像
阿琪
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 129
注册: 2005-06-07 18:14

帖子vicky1986 » 2007-11-22 02:39

謝謝你阿~~我懂了!!!!!
vicky1986
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 23
注册: 2007-07-12 18:17


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

在线用户

正在浏览此版面的用户:没有注册用户 和 8 位游客

cron