Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - 一道題

一道題

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

一道題

文章Pufa » 2005-01-27 21:57

It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure to the publicity about the supposedly inhuman working conditions in the foreign factories that furnish Zanco with many of its parts.
Zanco's failure has more to do with defects in its products than with any boycott on moral grounds.
After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as
those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products.

The argument in the passage is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A)People are unlikely to let moral considerations affect what products they decide to purchase.
(B)People who patronize companies supplied by factories where working conditions are as bad as
those of Zanco's suppliers are aware of those conditions.
(C)The working conditions in the factories that supply Zanco with parts are not as bad as has been claimed.
(D)Zanco's sales did not dip sharply after the poor working conditions in its suppliers' factories became known.
(E)The poor quality of Zanco's products is not a result of the working conditions
in the foreign factories where its parts are manufactured.


正確答案是B,我選A。
這題是從Kaplan GMAT 800這本書裡手工打上來的。
看懂題目跟題項就花了不少時間,還選錯。

可不可以請各位前輩替我解釋一下,感激不盡。
(我還是先做OG的CR好了... +o( )
You get what you share
頭像
Pufa
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1477
註冊時間: 2004-10-25 17:37

Re: 一道題

文章liwuu » 2005-01-27 22:52

P大,準備慢慢要加溫囉!!加油了...

Pufa \$m[1]:It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure to the publicity about the supposedly inhuman working conditions in the foreign factories that furnish Zanco with many of its parts.(說明Zanco的失敗不是一般大眾認為的供應商inhuman working conditions)
Zanco's failure has more to do with defects in its products than with any boycott on moral grounds. (認為有其他更關鍵的原因)
After all, plenty of other companies are supplied by factories with working conditions just as bad as those in Zanco's suppliers, and the public does not hesitate to buy their products. (解釋為什麼做以上推論,因為其他廠商的suppliers工作環境也不好,不過顧客仍願購買其產品)

The argument in the passage is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A)People are unlikely to let moral considerations affect what products they decide to purchase.
(B)People who patronize companies supplied by factories where working conditions are as bad as those of Zanco's suppliers are aware of those conditions.
(C)The working conditions in the factories that supply Zanco with parts are not as bad as has been claimed.
(D)Zanco's sales did not dip sharply after the poor working conditions in its suppliers' factories became known.
(E)The poor quality of Zanco's products is not a result of the working conditions in the foreign factories where its parts are manufactured.


正確答案是B,我選A。
這題是從Kaplan GMAT 800這本書裡手工打上來的。
看懂題目跟題項就花了不少時間,還選錯。

可不可以請各位前輩替我解釋一下,感激不盡。
(我還是先做OG的CR好了... +o( )


答案B說明消費者充分了解這些訊息,意即若是消費者並不知道其購買產品背後供應商的工作環境,則 不能做以上之推論!!(因為消費者會去購買其產品,可能是在不清楚該產品供應商的工作環境情形)
夫妻同心,其利斷金...Magical Mr. MISTOFFELEES
昂首千丘遠,嘯傲風間;堪尋敵手共論劍,高處不勝寒
頭像
liwuu
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 1639
註冊時間: 2004-11-17 06:02

文章Pufa » 2005-01-27 23:40

liwuu \$m[1]:P大,準備慢慢要加溫囉!!加油了...

是!!liwuu哥~
在連續三個學期15學分後,下學期終於只剩下3學分跟論文,可以多點準備GMAT了....請你多多指點我....



那為什麼A不行?
『道德問題不影響消費者的購買意願』,好像也可以當作這題的假設。

還有B的解釋我看的有點誤殺殺,
liwuu \$m[1]:It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure to the publicity about the supposedly inhuman working conditions in the foreign factories that furnish Zanco with many of its parts.(說明Zanco的失敗不是一般大眾認為的供應商inhuman working conditions)

這題第一句的意思是不是隱含大眾已經知道inhuman working condition這件事情了呢?
如果是的話,B我就可以接受了,只不過我還是不知道怎麼否定A...
You get what you share
頭像
Pufa
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1477
註冊時間: 2004-10-25 17:37

文章liwuu » 2005-01-28 00:58

Pufa \$m[1]:
那為什麼A不行?
『道德問題不影響消費者的購買意願』,好像也可以當作這題的假設.

liwuu:A選項有點算是牽扯到主觀選項,意即消費者的態度為何,通常這種選項不選,另外如果不影響購買意願, 那麼也沒有進一步解釋到為何Zanco會失敗的原因!!

還有B的解釋我看的有點誤殺殺,
liwuu \$m[1]:It is mistaken to attribute Zanco's failure to the publicity about the supposedly inhuman working conditions in the foreign factories that furnish Zanco with many of its parts.(說明Zanco的失敗不是一般大眾認為的供應商inhuman working conditions)

這題第一句的意思是不是隱含大眾已經知道inhuman working condition這件事情了呢?
如果是的話,B我就可以接受了,只不過我還是不知道怎麼否定A...


不是這個意思,這邊我說的不太清楚,B選項主要是說明消費者在已經了解產品供應商的 工作環境狀況也不好的情況下,仍購買其產品!!這樣子才能如題目中推論Zanco失敗是因為其他因素!!
ps.仔細看題目的第三句,僅說明其他廠商的供應商狀況,並沒有明說消費者已經知道這個訊息!!
夫妻同心,其利斷金...Magical Mr. MISTOFFELEES
昂首千丘遠,嘯傲風間;堪尋敵手共論劍,高處不勝寒
頭像
liwuu
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 1639
註冊時間: 2004-11-17 06:02

文章Pufa » 2005-01-28 09:40

突然之間豁然開朗 謝謝liwuu哥~
You get what you share
頭像
Pufa
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1477
註冊時間: 2004-10-25 17:37


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 7 位訪客