[size=18]97. A scientific theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements: it must accurately describe a large class of observations in terms of a model that is simple enough to contain only a few elements, and it must make definite predictions about the results of future observations. For example, Aristotle’s cosmological theory, which claimed that everything was made out of four elements---earth, air, fire, and water---satisfied the first requirement, but it did not make any definite predictions. Thus, Aristotle’s cosmological theory was not a good theory.
If all the statements in the passage are true, each of the following must also be true EXCEPT:
(A) Prediction about the results of future observations must be made by any good scientific theory
(B) Observation of physical phenomena was not a major concern in Aristotle’s cosmological theory.
(C) For elements can be the basis of a scientific model that is simple enough to meet the simplicity criterion of a good theory.
(D) A scientific model that contains many elements is not a good theory.
(E) Aristotle’s cosmological theory described a large class of observations in terms of only four elements.
好的科學理論需要滿足兩個要件。1. 將大範圍觀察以簡單到只包含幾項基本要素的模型精確描述。 2. 對於未來觀察結果做出明確的預測。
(A)對於未來觀察結果的預測,一定由好的科學理論做出。
個人認為,題目當中只提到"好的理論→明確預測",並不代表此一邏輯可逆向解釋,而推出預測一定由好的理論做出。
以上是我的疑問,煩請指教,謝謝。[/size]