Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - GWD3-Q8

GWD3-Q8

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

GWD3-Q8

文章QQcandy » 2004-08-27 01:49

Q8:
Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Garnet and RenCo each provide health care for their employees. Garnet pays for both testing of its employees’ cholesterol levels and treatment of high cholesterol. This policy saves Garnet money, since high cholesterol left untreated for many years leads to conditions that require very expensive treatment. However, RenCo dose not have the same financial incentive to adopt such a policy, because ______.

A. early treatment of high cholesterol dose not entirely eliminate the possibility of a stroke later in life

B. the mass media regularly feature stories encouraging people to maintain diets that are low in cholesterol

C. RenCo has significantly more employees than Garnet has

D. RenCo’s employees are unlikely to have higher cholesterol levels than Garnet’s employees

E. the average length of time an employee stays with RenCo is less than it is with Garnet


Anyone tells me why the answer "D" is wrong ? ....It's possible that their employee won't have higher cholesterol levels than Garnet's employees (ex. such as.....the propotion of employee's age at RenCo. is tend to have more young ppl etc.)
頭像
QQcandy
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1298
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:05

文章訪客 » 2004-08-27 16:21

let me explain it for you
Garnet forcuses on saving money becuase it's possible to cost more money if high cholesterol left untreated for many years leads to conditions that require very expensive treatment
This question assumet that company's employee will stay in this company for a long time.
Thus E is correct.
It's not necessary for Renco to take this policy because it cancel the assumption.

D doesn't mention any point which weak the assumption or something.
訪客
 

文章ilovecushi » 2008-07-16 18:40

不知道是不是上班太累了 我看了上面的解釋半天 還是不懂為什麼D不對
D也是提供了一個 理由 告知R公司可以不用該政策呀

還是說 因為 E比較緊扣原題 談到時間 比D更好
如果沒有E 是不是就選D呢?

謝謝指教
ilovecushi
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 41
註冊時間: 2007-11-29 00:53

文章bmwmthree » 2008-07-24 12:48

ilovecushi \$m[1]:不知道是不是上班太累了 我看了上面的解釋半天 還是不懂為什麼D不對
D也是提供了一個 理由 告知R公司可以不用該政策呀

還是說 因為 E比較緊扣原題 談到時間 比D更好
如果沒有E 是不是就選D呢?

謝謝指教


This policy saves Garnet money, since high cholesterol left untreated for many years leads to conditions that require very expensive treatment. However, RenCo dose not have the same financial incentive to adopt such a policy, because ______.


本題所要強調的是上面紅字的
就是RenCo並沒有相同的財務誘因去採用這個政策
why? 因為它的員工平均流動率比Garnet高..那RenCo花這錢幹麻?
幫員工保了...結果他...兩天就離職....浪費錢
要時間長才會見效
(D)雖然也可以使Renco沒有誘因去採行該政策, 但題目說道Garnet是因為
如果高膽固醇不治療多年以後, 將會使公司花費更大的錢,
所以關鍵在於時間

小弟淺見, 請多包含
bmwmthree
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 24
註冊時間: 2006-03-19 15:28

文章ilovecushi » 2008-07-24 13:37

很清楚~
謝謝解答

可能我的功力還不足 要多加油了~~
ilovecushi
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 41
註冊時間: 2007-11-29 00:53


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 24 位訪客