PP2 CR # 111

[autumn713]

111. No ambitious politician will challenge an elected public official running for reelection unless that official appears vulnerable. Nonetheless, elected public officials who do not appear vulnerable as they attempt to win reelection rarely run unopposed.
If the statements are true, which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from them?
(A) If an elected official running for reelection appears vulnerable, that official's challengers will all be ambitious politicians.
(B) Some elected officials running for reelection are challenged by people who are not ambitious politicians.
(C) Elected officials running for reelection who do not appear vulnerable are themselves ambitious politicians.
(D) A person who is not an ambitious politician cannot win an election contested by the current officeholder.
(E) A politician's career will be seriously set back if the politician wages an unsuccessful campaign for elective office.

ANS: B
我覺的我應該是賽到的　不知道大家這一題　怎麼解比較好??
我的想法:
官員爛ambitious politician反對
官員不爛 non ambitious politician反對
So, Some elected officials running for reelection are challenged by people who are not ambitious politicians.

請指教　:)

[dibert8]

official appears vulnerable are challenged by ambitious politicians.
officials who do not appear vulnerable are opposed (not by ambitious politicians).
=> (B)

(A) 牴觸第一句話
(C) 沒提 officials = ambitious politicians
(D) 沒提 ambitious politician cannot win
(E) 沒提 politician's career