Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - 大全 B-16

大全 B-16

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

大全 B-16

文章CherrieLi » 2007-12-27 21:58

16.Some commentators complain that a “litigation explosion” in the past decade has led to unreasonably high costs for U.S. businesses by encouraging more product liability suits against manufacturers. However, these complaints are based mainly on myth. Statistics show that the number of successful product liability suits has remained almost the same, and the average sum awarded in damages has grown no faster than the inflation rate.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) The number of unsuccessful suits has skyrocketed, imposing huge new legal expenses on businesses.
(B) Several of the largest awards ever made in product liability cases occurred within the last two years.
(C) The rise of the consumer movement has encouraged citizens to seek legal redress for product flaws.
(D) Lawyers often undertake product liability cases on a contingency basis, so their payment is based on the size of the damages awarded.
(E) Juries often award damages in product liability suits out of emotional sympathy for an injured consumer.

答案A, 看不太懂題目意思, 這裡的successful product liability suits是指 manufacture勝訴, 還是 consumer 勝訴呢? CDE哪裡錯呢?
CherrieLi
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 125
註冊時間: 2007-06-14 21:37

Re: 大全 B-16

文章amazingslim » 2007-12-27 22:30

CherrieLi \$m[1]:16.Some commentators complain that a “litigation explosion” in the past decade has led to unreasonably high costs for U.S. businesses by encouraging more product liability suits against manufacturers. However, these complaints are based mainly on myth. Statistics show that the number of successful product liability suits has remained almost the same, and the average sum awarded in damages has grown no faster than the inflation rate.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) The number of unsuccessful suits has skyrocketed, imposing huge new legal expenses on businesses.
(B) Several of the largest awards ever made in product liability cases occurred within the last two years.
(C) The rise of the consumer movement has encouraged citizens to seek legal redress for product flaws.
(D) Lawyers often undertake product liability cases on a contingency basis, so their payment is based on the size of the damages awarded.
(E) Juries often award damages in product liability suits out of emotional sympathy for an injured consumer.

答案A, 看不太懂題目意思, 這裡的successful product liability suits是指 manufacture勝訴, 還是 consumer 勝訴呢? CDE哪裡錯呢?


題目說有人抱怨因為鼓勵產品責任訴訟而造成公司大筆成本,但是argument不贊同,說成功的訴訟數目幾乎還是ㄧ樣,而且平均理賠總數也未超過通膨率
要weaken題目,答案要跟$有關
(A)不成功的訴訟大增,造成公司龐大的費用:OK,說明即使成功數一樣,但是不成功的案件還是造成公司負擔
(C)鼓勵市民:無關
(D)律師的收費標準:無關
(E)陪審團出於同情判給賠償:無關
amazingslim
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 147
註冊時間: 2007-08-11 17:14

文章CherrieLi » 2008-01-12 20:01

大致上都能瞭解, 有一點不解的是...successful product liability suits是指 manufacture勝訴, 還是 consumer 勝訴呢?
如果是manufacture勝訴, A的選項就沒問題了...

但如果是consumer 勝訴, A選項就不行解釋了吧...因為有很多的unsuccessful suits, 所以businesses不用負擔damage,

請問的的思路有錯嗎? 因為我再怎麼看, 都覺得這裡的 successful product liability suits是指 consumer 勝訴
CherrieLi
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 125
註冊時間: 2007-06-14 21:37

文章amazingslim » 2008-01-12 20:56

successful product liability suits是指 consumer 勝訴=>沒錯
因為即使訴訟沒成功,公司還是要負擔律師費用,
所以即使訴訟成功案件一樣,damage金額差不多,訴訟不成功的案件增加對公司來說仍是很大負擔
amazingslim
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 147
註冊時間: 2007-08-11 17:14

文章CherrieLi » 2008-01-12 23:23

喔...這麼一點我就通了...我的法律常識果然很爛...不知道不成功也要負擔律師費用....=.=

amazing!!!謝謝你 ^^
CherrieLi
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 125
註冊時間: 2007-06-14 21:37


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 5 位訪客