大全11-06

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

大全11-06

文章CherrieLi » 2008-01-14 12:18

6.F: We ought not to test the safety of new drugs on sentient animals, such as dogs and rabbits. Our benefit means their pain, and they are equal to us in the capacity to feel pain.
G: We must carry out such tests; otherwise, we would irresponsibly sacrifice the human lives that could have been saved by the drugs.

Which of the following, if true, is the best objection that could be made from F’s point of view to counter G’s point?

(A) Even though it is not necessary for people to use cosmetics, cosmetics are also being tested on sentient animals.

(B) Medical science already has at its disposal a great number of drugs and other treatments for serious illnesses.

(C) It is not possible to obtain scientifically adequate results by testing drugs in the test tube, without making tests on living tissue.

(D) Some of the drugs to be tested would save human beings from great pain.

(E) Many tests now performed on sentient animals can be performed equally well on fertilized chicken eggs that are at a very early stage of development.

答案是E, 想請問一下為什麼A不對呢? 覺得A挺合理的, 因為 cosmetics是跟人類life沒關的東西, 但卻一樣用那些動物來做試驗

請幫忙提供思路...謝謝...
CherrieLi
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 125
註冊時間: 2007-06-14 21:37

文章amazingslim » 2008-01-14 14:44

我本來一開始也選A
但是想想
A is out of scope.
safety of new drugs on sentient animals:題目在討論藥,但是A講到化妝品,離題了

E:有使動物感到不痛苦的新藥測試方法(蛋:還沒發展成動物)
(他因造成同果: human lives that could have been saved by the drugs 因此weaken G's argument)
amazingslim
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 147
註冊時間: 2007-08-11 17:14


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 8 位訪客