Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - GWD2-Q28

GWD2-Q28

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

GWD2-Q28

文章yilingsky » 2008-06-30 17:34

GWD2-Q28:
Fearing competition from stores that rent video games for home use, owners of stores that sell video games lobbied for protective legislation. Citing as a precedent legislation that postpones home film rentals until one year after general release to theaters, the video sellers proposed as an equitable solution a plan that would postpone rental of any video game until it had been available for sale for one year.

Which of the following, if true, would support an objection by owners of video rental stores that the fairness of the proposed legislation is not supported by the precedent cited?

(A) Although the daily rental fee for home use of films is generally the same as that for video games, the average rental period for a video game is longer than that for a film.
(B) Film rentals for home use tend to particularly strong during the first year after a film has been made available for both sale and rental at video rental stores.
(C) Most people are interested in playing only the latest video games and tend to find video games that have been available for over a year unappealing whether they have played them before or not, whereas films maintain their appeal far longer after their release.
(D) People who rent video games tend to play them by themselves, whereas people who rent films invite friends and neighbors to watch.
(E) A slight decline in revenues from films that have been recently released in theaters has been attributed to the growing market for rentals of films for home use.

答案:C

想請教各位大大, 這題是屬於support 還是 waeken, 看很久不知到底要問什麼?
yilingsky
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 26
註冊時間: 2006-01-17 14:41

文章DoDoPrac » 2008-07-10 22:13

這題題目的確有點繞...
主要出現兩票人馬在做對抗:
(1) owners of stores that sell video games
(2) owners of video rental stores (文章的stores that rent video games)

文章主要是說:
owners of stores that sell video games 害怕 stores that rent video games出租遊戲以供家庭使用, 所以就遊說立法,
依照適用於video的法條(電影上映一年後才可租借video), 遊戲也要上市販售一年後才可以在店內租借家用

問題是在問: 哪一個選項支持owners of video rental stores 的反對: "video出租的法條不適用於games出租上"?
所以題目應該是 "Weaken題", 要weaken的是owners of stores that sell video games的言論...

我是這樣看題目的: support a objection 是 "正負得負"-- 所以是WEAKEN題

答案的話, 我認為是要選Argument中有 "Faulty analogy"的概念的內容: 即"games"的情況不能和"videos"的情況比較!!
(C) 選項有在說明兩者情況不同,不可以相提並論, 反對了owners of stores that sell video games 的言論...

真得是考閱讀能力的一題啊~
多一分對他人的猜忌,就少一分對自己的自信!
DoDoPrac
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 25
註冊時間: 2008-06-14 06:49


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 18 位訪客