[問題]GWD-8-Q38

[yotoan]

求助~
GWD-8-Q38:
Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild. The countries in which the tigers’ habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting. Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured.
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

A. assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced
B. considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species
C. fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers
D. neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting
E. takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers’ survival as a guarantee of their survival

Ans:E
這題我素用猜的..
但想請教思路怎麼走出來??
謝謝大大先~

[lightblue]

求助~
GWD-8-Q38:
Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild. The countries in which the tigers’ habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting. Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured.
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

A. assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced
B. considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species
C. fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers
D. neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting
E. takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers’ survival as a guarantee of their survival

Ans:E
這題我素用猜的..
但想請教思路怎麼走出來??
謝謝大大先~

這題是說 hunt 會影響 tiger 使tiger絕種
那如果 立法禁止hunt 就可以確保tiger 不絕種

e 很清楚的說 只有考慮到hunt
移除hunt 後可能還有 自然環境的不適合 tiger 本身不想生之類的原因沒考慮

另外
a :ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced
no mentioned
B :other endangered animal species
out of range
C:how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers

not mentioned
D : 是比較有可能 不過想想後覺得也是not mentioned 因為以前的努力跟結果跟這次並沒有關係!!

[小妤]

可是按照黃冠文的說法
weaken(vulnerable to criticism?)方法不可行有三種方式:
方法不可行,人不配合,方法本身有副作用
我覺得A,如果說這個禁令其實無法貫徹
是不是也可以weaken呢?

[liwuu]

我想選項A用了比較主觀且所謂程度的字眼(sufficiant)
通常這樣的答案不會上選...CR的答案通常都是用客觀的事實來support or weaken!!

[訪客]

可是按照黃冠文的說法
weaken(vulnerable to criticism?)方法不可行有三種方式:
方法不可行,人不配合,方法本身有副作用
我覺得A,如果說這個禁令其實無法貫徹
是不是也可以weaken呢?

這題要選的答案應為被認為是為什麼會被vulnerable critisized的選項
如同liwuu所講的
A的without sufficient warrant你不能實際的憑題目的內容去做判斷,這太抽象
E的選項就很直接的點出把妨礙老虎生存的因素去掉就是能夠保證他會老虎永遠生存

Open to discuss

[Pudding]

覺得A的問題正在於去質疑legislation的可行性.
而題目已經說明, IF these countries CAN successfully enforce this legislation... 這是本題的前提條件...

本題的邏輯觀念在於證明 "有A就有B", 但 "沒有A未必沒有B"
也就是說, 如果下雨, 考試就延期,
但沒下雨, 不表示考試一定不會延期 (可能颱風, 可能地震, 可能...)

類似的, tiger hunting如果不減少, tiger就會瀕臨滅絕,
但減少了tiger hunting, 不表示tiger就一定不會滅絕...
這就是E所說的...

個人看法, 請大家繼續討論...

[acharlie]

覺得A的問題正在於去質疑legislation的可行性.
而題目已經說明, IF these countries CAN successfully enforce this legislation... 這是本題的前提條件...

本題的邏輯觀念在於證明 "有A就有B", 但 "沒有A未必沒有B"
也就是說, 如果下雨, 考試就延期,
但沒下雨, 不表示考試一定不會延期 (可能颱風, 可能地震, 可能...)

類似的, tiger hunting如果不減少, tiger就會瀕臨滅絕,
但減少了tiger hunting, 不表示tiger就一定不會滅絕...
這就是E所說的...

個人看法, 請大家繼續討論...

個人覺得(A)選項就是題目最後一句話的改寫法
所以不能夠否定..

[ivy]

嗯~就像Pudding說的..
if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation..是前提
則我們不能去否定前提 故(A)錯

[hccill]

我請問一下各位大大,

題目中的most vulnerable to criticism到底是什麼意思阿?

是weaken?還是要選出一個最不能weaken的呢?

還請大家告訴我一下杯....

謝謝喔!!

[ergh]

看了CD的結論，有一重大發現
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument→此乃為逻辑错误题，不是WEAKEN题

所以主要找出題目中邏輯推論錯誤的地方，題目主要錯把老虎生存的必要條件作为充分條件，即：禁止捕殺老虎 推出 老虎不會滅絕。