photos that are worth more than a thousand words

由 **tky** » 2009-11-05 10:41

今天在NYT看到一個標題:
photos that are worth more than a thousand words

雖然懂它的意思
但覺得that的用法很奇怪

有人可以解釋一下嗎?

謝謝^^

由 **upl** » 2009-11-05 15:54

tky \$m[1]:今天在NYT看到一個標題:
photos that are worth more than a thousand words

雖然懂它的意思
但覺得that的用法很奇怪

有人可以解釋一下嗎?

謝謝^^

圖片勝過於文字的意思吧

你的問題在哪裡呢?

8-)

由 **tky** » 2009-11-05 17:45

hi

我說我看得懂意思
是不知道為什麼要多加個that
寫成"photos are worth more than a thousand words"不就好了嗎?
幹嘛要多個that?

由 **sandarac** » 2009-11-07 07:42

tky \$m[1]:hi

我說我看得懂意思
是不知道為什麼要多加個that
寫成"photos are worth more than a thousand words"不就好了嗎?
幹嘛要多個that?

因為兩者意思不一樣!
加了that 是有省略了前面了 "These are" photos that...也就是基本上應該有指定某些特定的照片
如果是photos are worth more than a thousand words那就沒有指定了...變成泛指一般情況..任何照片都比文字好

由 **ggmmla** » 2009-11-07 07:48

受教了~

原來是這樣

:omg:

由 **tky** » 2009-11-07 23:36

sandarac \$m[1]:
tky \$m[1]:hi

我說我看得懂意思
是不知道為什麼要多加個that
寫成"photos are worth more than a thousand words"不就好了嗎?
幹嘛要多個that?

因為兩者意思不一樣!
加了that 是有省略了前面了 "These are" photos that...也就是基本上應該有指定某些特定的照片
如果是photos are worth more than a thousand words那就沒有指定了...變成泛指一般情況..任何照片都比文字好

哇~!
強者出現了

謝謝你幫我解惑^ ^

photos that are worth more than a thousand words

photos that are worth more than a thousand words

Re: photos that are worth more than a thousand words

Re: photos that are worth more than a thousand words

Re: photos that are worth more than a thousand words

Re: photos that are worth more than a thousand words

Re: photos that are worth more than a thousand words

誰在線上