Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 查看主题 - 6/30 台北780

6/30 台北780

二戰和多戰考友探討經驗教訓, 專業分析考生備考誤區, 機經, 臨考叮嚀

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

6/30 台北780

帖子deed » 2006-07-02 00:59

小弟一直是潛水會員,
直到考完才敢跟大家分享一些考試的心得,
大家可以一起討論。

我當兵前補過習,
但是一直很忙碌,
去年底考完托福,過了年又要找工作,
直到前陣子退伍才能專心看書。
我退伍前的兩個月利用晚上幾小時的時間,
把OG10th跟11th做完,算是複習吧。
預計是退伍後一個月考。

這一個月就是寫GWD31套(其實是32套啦,新舊的第31套不一樣)
每天寫兩回Verbal(數學只挑了難題出來寫)
加上30題SC大全(因為我覺得SC多寫會很有感覺,像TOEFL的文法一樣)
考前15天加練一回AWA(issue+argument)
寫加檢討就佔了一天去了,
過的真的很痛苦,加上求職上的一些瑣事要處理,
心理壓力其實很大。

熬著熬著,到了考前一天再把機經看完,就去考試了。
考試的時候倒是很莫名的焦慮,
我計量部分很少寫這麼久過(何況還看過機經)
到30題左右盡是一些沒見過的題型,
或是語意很模糊的題目,
我霎時有點著急,
居然到65分鐘時才寫完(我平時自己模考大約花30分鐘)

Verbal也是重蹈計量部份覆轍,
25題左右出現了很多LSAT式的新CR題,
就是給你一段論述,
然後要指出這段論述哪個部份的邏輯出了錯。
五個選項都極型而上
,我甚至有點放棄,
然後35題開始居然是between..and慣用的SC,
心想不是要重來吧.. ;''(
忐忑不安間就考完了。

等成績的一瞬間真是不敢看,
但大出我意料,
Q51,V44,780
鬆了一口氣。

我算了一下,
我遇到的機經,
計量有27題,文法有8題(SC+CR),
閱讀四篇都是機經,運氣不錯。
計量部份的機經真的很重要,
畢竟有機經之下math要滿分不難,
如果math滿分,verbal只要32.33就可能上700了,
投資報酬率相對高..XD

至於我提到的LSAT式的CR題目,
大家可以在FeiFei的LSAT邏輯精選裡找到,
不知是測試題,還是正式加入的新題型?
BOLDFACE我倒是一題都沒遇上,
是否BOLDFACE不受青睞,新制出題率大減?

考完以後真的很感謝咖啡店還有對岸的CD,
陪我度過這段難熬的日子,
祝福大家都能得到自己心目中的理想分數,
也希望有機會回饋大家^^
deed
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 28
注册: 2005-01-03 22:47

帖子wun » 2006-07-02 01:33

太強了!!! :|||
我最近也面臨求職與準備考試的雙重壓力...
看完你的文章給了我很大的鼓舞~~
也祝你申請學校順利喔~~
wun
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 27
注册: 2005-02-25 20:19

帖子scujean » 2006-07-02 07:32

感謝分享,可以告訴一下AWA的題目嗎..感謝

25題左右出現了很多LSAT式的新CR題,
就是給你一段論述,
然後要指出這段論述哪個部份的邏輯出了錯。
五個選項都極型而上
請問這種題型
算是weaken或是evaluation 還是哪一種?

最後請問,如果是gwd得CR分類 和feifei邏輯
剩20天建議 作哪一個 感謝 ;-$
感謝BULL的熱心幫忙~
--------------------------
MS Accounting 2007 spring at UT Dallas
----------------------------
头像
scujean
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 317
注册: 2005-11-10 16:44
地址: blue planet

帖子deed » 2006-07-02 12:56

To wun
謝謝你,相信大家有心都能考到心中的理想分數,加油! :smile

To scujean
我沒有很建議寫FeiFei的邏輯精選,
雖然在題幹的敘述方面很有AT的感覺,
但是在解構上用的是比較不同的方法。
還是以GWD及OG為主吧,我還是考到一兩題GWD的題,
最近GWD的CR題在機考中重複出題的機率有略提高說。
完整複習完以後再把FeiFei邏輯拿來練習寫新題吧 ;yes;

抱歉我都沒寫什麼機經,因為自己是月底考,
加上CD的機經實在很整齊,不好意思獻醜 ;-$
我的AWA是
argument No.1
“Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient. In color film processing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5-inch print fell from 50 cents for five-day service in 1970 to 20 cents for one-day service in 1984. The same principle applies to the processing of food. And since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its twenty-fifth birthday, we can expect that our long experience will enable us to minimize costs and thus maximize profits.”

issue No.11
“When someone achieves greatness in any field — such as the arts, science, politics, or business — that person’s achievements are more important than any of his or her personal faults.”


最後,
針對我提到的題型我在LSAT找了個類題,
但是我沒看到哪位前輩有提到考到類似的,
大家可以看看有個底就好,

Questions 49-50
Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre de Fermat died in 1665 without leaving behind any written proof for a theorem that he claimed nonetheless to have proved. Probably this alleged theorem simply cannot be proved, since---as the article points out---no one else has been able to prove it. Therefore it is likely that Fermat was either lying or else mistaken when he made his claim.

Laura: Your encyclopedia is out of date. Recently someone has in fact proved Fermat’s theorem. And since the theorem is provable, your claim---that Fermat was lying or mistaken---clearly is wrong.

50. Which one of the following most accurately describes a reasoning error in Laura’s argument?
(A) It purports to establish its conclusion by making a claim that, if true, would actually contradict that conclusion.
(B) It mistakenly assumes that the quality of a person’s character can legitimately be taken to guarantee the accuracy of the claims that person has made.
(C) It mistakes something that is necessary for its conclusion to follow for something that ensures that the conclusion follows.
(D) It uses the term “provable” without defining it.
(E) It fails to distinguish between a true claim that has mistakenly between believed to be false and a false claim that has mistakenly been believed to be true.

公佈的答案是C
deed
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 28
注册: 2005-01-03 22:47

帖子frenemy912 » 2006-07-02 21:16

請問GWD現在有哪麼多套了嗎?? 我在資料庫裡沒有看到32套耶.....謝謝
frenemy912
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 26
注册: 2005-04-21 13:12

帖子deed » 2006-07-03 11:31

frenemy912 \$m[1]:請問GWD現在有哪麼多套了嗎?? 我在資料庫裡沒有看到32套耶.....謝謝


現在有一組是濤濤31套,加上舊的第31套不一樣,所以我說32套 :PP
我記得有人提供下載喔,可以再去看看,
不然就去CD下吧,不過還要解碼就是了。 加油

這篇就是囉 ;yes;
http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=18382
deed
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 28
注册: 2005-01-03 22:47


回到 GMAT 機經分享 / 考試心得經驗談

在线用户

正在浏览此版面的用户:没有注册用户 和 11 位游客

cron