Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - prep-t2-39

prep-t2-39

二戰和多戰考友探討經驗教訓, 專業分析考生備考誤區, 機經, 臨考叮嚀

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

prep-t2-39

文章vicky1986 » 2007-11-24 01:14

39. (32799-!-item-!-188;#058&007548

The imposition of quotas limiting imported steel will not help the big American steel mills. In fact, the quotas will help "mini-mills" flourish in the United States. Those small domestic mills will take more business from the big American steel mills than would have been taken by the foreign steel mills in the absence of quotas.

Which of the following, if true, would cast the most serious doubt on the claim made in the last sentence above?

(A) Quality rather than price is a major factor in determining the type of steel to be used for a particular application.

(B) Foreign steel mills have long produced grades of steel comparable in quality to the steel produced by the big American mills.

(C) American quotas on imported goods have often induced other countries to impose similar quotas on American goods.

(D) Domestic "mini-mills" consistently produce better grades of steel than do the big American mills.

(E) Domestic "mini-mills" produce low-volume, specialized types of steel that are not produced by the big American steel mills.

正確答案e

b選項我還是有點迷惑
如果foreign 跟 大鋼廠 的品質一樣的話
則原本被foreign搶走的市場 就會屬於 大鋼廠而不是小鋼廠了
那B選項不就成立了嗎
還是說因為品質一樣不代表產品的性質一樣嗎?
拜託各位知道的人可以幫我解答^^
vicky1986
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 23
註冊時間: 2007-07-12 18:17

文章vicky1986 » 2007-11-24 01:18

po錯地方阿~~~對不起
vicky1986
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 23
註冊時間: 2007-07-12 18:17

Re: prep-t2-39

文章chencraig0227 » 2007-11-24 04:11

vicky1986 \$m[1]:39. (32799-!-item-!-188;#058&007548

The imposition of quotas limiting imported steel will not help the big American steel mills. In fact, the quotas will help "mini-mills" flourish in the United States. Those small domestic mills will take more business from the big American steel mills than would have been taken by the foreign steel mills in the absence of quotas.

Which of the following, if true, would cast the most serious doubt on the claim made in the last sentence above?

(A) Quality rather than price is a major factor in determining the type of steel to be used for a particular application.

(B) Foreign steel mills have long produced grades of steel comparable in quality to the steel produced by the big American mills.

(C) American quotas on imported goods have often induced other countries to impose similar quotas on American goods.

(D) Domestic "mini-mills" consistently produce better grades of steel than do the big American mills.

(E) Domestic "mini-mills" produce low-volume, specialized types of steel that are not produced by the big American steel mills.

正確答案e

b選項我還是有點迷惑
如果foreign 跟 大鋼廠 的品質一樣的話
則原本被foreign搶走的市場 就會屬於 大鋼廠而不是小鋼廠了那B選項不就成立了嗎
還是說因為品質一樣不代表產品的性質一樣嗎?
拜託各位知道的人可以幫我解答^^


反黑部分→ 原文並沒有提到品質的高低跟搶不搶生意有沒有關係。
這部份純粹是您過度臆測!
(假如mini-mill的品質比foreign更好呢?)

可是! 只要mini-mill生產的產品根本就跟大鋼廠不一樣...
那麼是不是不管品質或者是其他因素...小鋼廠打死不可能搶走大鋼廠的生意!! 所以E絕對比B來的好!
頭像
chencraig0227
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 236
註冊時間: 2007-08-09 22:53


回到 GMAT 機經分享 / 考試心得經驗談

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 10 位訪客