好像很少看到有人討論IMD...

[frenemy912]

好像很少看到有人討論IMD..想問問有人比較有研究的嘛??謝謝

[modern]

they prefer very experienced student e.g. 6~10 years :)

[jason]

they prefer very experienced student e.g. 6~10 years :)

plus, trilingual user ~

[陳鵬文]

據我所知啦 我不確定 去年大陸好像也只收一個人 不是名氣不大 而是收的人太少 而且偏向industry 所以透明度比較不高
上的了當然大推要去囉 哇哈哈 去chase dream看看吧 有人連載IMD日記

[MarkHsu]

IMD is not a "traditional b-school" in the sense that most of the job opps. are in industry and not in finance/consulting.

Some drawbacks (if you are looking for a traditional MBA)
--small network (~90 people per class)
--lack of recruitment opps.

[維尼]

Hi Mark,

Since IMD is not considered a traditional b-school, what advantages does it possess for someone who wants to stay in certain industry?

[MarkHsu]

According to a friend who attended IMD, she mentions if you want to work for European big corporates then you can't go wrong attending IMD.

1) Would suggest prospective students check out the career report
2) The friend worked in Pharma--Novartis

I am guessing companies like Phillips, Nokia, European pharamceutical comapanies and global European firms would be big recruiters

[習慣仔]

What a coincidence!

I also have a friend from Novartis who attended IMD in '05.

Despite the class-size, which I consider it not a drawback but an advantage, I truly believe that IMD gives more global insights (particularly from its senior, diversed students) than other top-schools. Besides, landing a job is much easier than other b-schools.

IMD is my dream school, above Harvard.

My 2 cents . . .

[csc]

以大家的想法，IMD似乎是以培養可以在產業奮鬥的專業經理人為主，強調實務
訓練，所以人數不多，要求強的工作經驗，來徵才的都是大型企業(非IB及
Consulting)，感覺挺獨樹一格的

[simonyu]

就我在MBA Tour跟IMD的代表談的經驗，他們大多數的學生都是由公司提供sponsorship的，實務取向很明顯。