Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - GWD12-20

GWD12-20

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

文章Ethan » 2004-11-28 12:58

D.Approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., the act of Congress also established the Library of Congress.
Ethan
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 454
註冊時間: 2004-11-02 17:01

文章Ethan » 2004-11-28 13:01

D.Approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., the act of Congress also established the Library of Congress.
Ethan
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 454
註冊時間: 2004-11-02 17:01

文章 » 2004-11-28 13:05

向Ethen 大大致敬 ~i57 i57 i57 i57 i57

辛苦啦

謝謝Ehtan大大花時間寫出一篇ETS版的解釋.....相信一定可以造福許多人i93
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章Ethan » 2004-11-28 13:09

E.Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also establishing the Library of Congress.
The error is same as B. Furthermore, “also establishing…” seems to modify Washington, D.C.
The reason why I say the error is same as B is that the confusion of the cause-effect relationship alters the intended meaning of the sentence.
The act of Congress did not intend to cause the establishment of the Library of Congress by the means of making provision.
Ethan
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 454
註冊時間: 2004-11-02 17:01

文章Ethan » 2004-11-28 13:27

A.Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established the Library of Congress.

1. The act of Congress was approved April 24, 1800.
2. The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800 made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C.
3. The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800 also established the Library of Congress.
Ethan
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 454
註冊時間: 2004-11-02 17:01

文章Ethan » 2004-11-28 13:33

我覺得那個also前的”,”是應該省略的。這是我對A所比較不接受的地方。
不知是否背題目的人沒有注意到 or else?
Ethan
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 454
註冊時間: 2004-11-02 17:01

文章 » 2004-11-28 13:41

Ethan :

B.The act of Congress, which was approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established the Library of Congress.
--> It implies that the act approved April 24, 1800 resulted in the provision. The shift of the emphasis in the orginal sentence alters the intended meaning.



3Q for your passion . BTW , i can't agree with your assertion as the BF above , i think your opinion for the BF is too arbitrary. In fact , i view B as a broken & fragmented sentence . i try to trace the clue to understand why you assert that there is a cause--effect relationship but fail . do you think that the participial phrase making provision ~ here modify The act of Congress ???

ple help to clarify it .i76
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章 » 2004-11-28 13:55

Ethan \$m[1]:If you put it in this way:
The act of Congress was approved April 24, 1800 and The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800 (that)made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C and The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800 ,also established the Library of Congress.

我覺得那個also前的”,”是應該省略的。這是我對A所比較不接受的地方。
不知是否背題目的人沒有注意到 or else?



NO !!!

I TOTALLY & STRONGLY agree with what you asser for choice A beside the "comma"

let's check it again :

Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city also established the Library of Congress.

( i omit the Washington, D.C. )

if so , the sentence is clear and correct .

BUT

Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C. also established the Library of Congress.

........it's so ...ugly & a littlt bit ~vague , doesn't ?
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章Ethan » 2004-11-28 16:21

魚:
有人盜用你的帳號嗎?
Ethan
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 454
註冊時間: 2004-11-02 17:01

文章 » 2004-11-28 16:30

Ethan 大大

花生什麼事 ! i69
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章Ethan » 2004-11-28 16:32

其實我也知道這樣講,可能實力弱的會聽不懂,
但是你要我再舉例說明,唉,sorry!
I'm tired.
我也覺得奇怪,這裡應該是要考 gmat的人來討論才對吧?
像你和我都考完了,卻還在這,*_*???奇怪???
Ethan
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 454
註冊時間: 2004-11-02 17:01

文章kikisky » 2004-11-28 16:38

Ethan \$m[1]:我也覺得奇怪,這裡應該是要考 gmat的人來討論才對吧?
像你和我都考完了,卻還在這,*_*???奇怪???


ethan~小朋友都正在唸og啦~
這麼難的題目~別拿來嚇他們了啦~ :P
頭像
kikisky
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 745
註冊時間: 2004-10-29 11:41

文章 » 2004-11-28 16:40

Ethan \$m[1]:其實我也知道這樣講,可能實力弱的會聽不懂,
但是你要我再舉例說明,唉,sorry!
I'm tired.
我也覺得奇怪,這裡應該是要考 gmat的人來討論才對吧?
像你和我都考完了,卻還在這,*_*???奇怪???


:D 沒辦法 ,人家就是實力不好咩 ~~~~~ :D :D :D :D

遇到高手當然要死抓著不放嚕 ;)

嗯 對啊 偶每天都絕得很奇怪 偶已經考完了耶 :-S :-S :-S

但是 沒關係吧 學無止境咩...........
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章Ethan » 2004-11-29 10:07

其實這一題還有一些地方需要修正,
但我想讓給未來的高手修正好了。
Ethan
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 454
註冊時間: 2004-11-02 17:01

文章Behemoth » 2004-11-29 12:05

Ethan \$m[1]:If you put it in this way:
The act of Congress was approved April 24, 1800 and The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800 (that)made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C and The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800 ,also established the Library of Congress.

我覺得那個also前的”,”是應該省略的。這是我對A所比較不接受的地方。
不知是否背題目的人沒有注意到 or else?


I think the comma before also here is ok because it is for the appositive "Washington, D.C" but not for "also"...
Eric Chang
MBA Class of 2008
MIT Sloan School of Management
頭像
Behemoth
管理員
管理員
 
文章: 2948
註冊時間: 2004-09-10 18:19
來自: Boston

上一頁下一頁

回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 3 位訪客

cron