llhc \$m[1]:哈哈 mazada77大哥真可愛
Notre Dame後頭竟然還多了Quasimodo
thanks for sharing o~~
我還以為是我看錯了勒, Quasimodo? 有加西莫多學院喔?
哈, 果然學長去看鐘樓怪人...餘音繞樑阿
今年的US News最新排名...聽說出來囉...!!!
58 篇文章 • 第 2 頁 (共 4 頁) • 1，2，3，4
由 evelynfantast » 2006-03-29 12:30
感謝Mazada77大哥!
是啊,波動真大....尤其是退步10幾名的UW-Seattle
怎麼會這樣呢,虧我這麼對他朝思又暮想的
不過Purdue.OSU.IUB Kelley戰況很激烈喔
還有可愛的UCI,雖然已經下好離手;但看到她的大躍進
還是不免有那一絲遺憾......
是啊,波動真大....尤其是退步10幾名的UW-Seattle
怎麼會這樣呢,虧我這麼對他朝思又暮想的
不過Purdue.OSU.IUB Kelley戰況很激烈喔
還有可愛的UCI,雖然已經下好離手;但看到她的大躍進
還是不免有那一絲遺憾......
Every life stage is a panic one,
wondering, pondering, and waiting.
With so little aspiration and so tiny dream
I do hope "studying abroad" isn't merely
a remote fairy tale.
wondering, pondering, and waiting.
With so little aspiration and so tiny dream
I do hope "studying abroad" isn't merely
a remote fairy tale.
-
evelynfantast - 中級會員
- 文章: 154
- 註冊時間: 2005-09-08 00:32
- 來自: 等待出國的寂寞台北城
由 peasant » 2006-03-29 13:55
[quote="agk99"]二十後的我沒印象
二十之 前的
前七不動如山
十名左右的如UCLA. NYU進步很多
但坦白說
還是Business Week的較有參考性[/quote]
ranking is subjective judgement. it'd be unfair to say a ranking from certain institute is more discriminating, and the other is less convincing. undoubtedly, people tend to use rankings as one of criteria to select schools. attached a feature from "The Times" for your reference.
----------------------------------------------
Rankings in danger of being outranked;MBA
Steve Coomber
19 January 2006
The Times
Focus Report 11
English
(c) 2006 Times Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved
Steve Coomber examines an MBA love-hate relationship.
EACH year business schools nervously await the announcement of yet another ranking. But with some schools -such as Harvard -not co-operating with certain rankings and with more of them every year, are they really useful to prospective students or are there better sources of information?
Management education is a rapidly expanding market. "In the late Eighties we had about 3,000 business schools worldwide, now it's over 9,000," says John Fernandes, chief executive officer of the accreditation body AACSB (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business), based in America.
"The proliferation of schools and programmes, particularly at MBA level, makes it difficult for students and clients to differentiate high-quality schools from those of doubtful value," says Michael Osbaldeston, director of Cranfield School of Management.
For prospective MBA students two of the most visible differentiators are business-school rankings and accreditation.Once it was just Business Week's biennial survey, now US News & World Report, the Financial Times, Forbes magazine, The Wall Street Journal and the Economist Intelligence Unit have all entered the rankings fray with confusing results.
Many business schools have a love-hate relationship with the rankings. Deans care about where their school appears, but protest that the rankings do not always reflect the true quality picture, and that servicing them takes up valuable time and resources.
"MBA rankings are a good tool for someone beginning the process of evaluating schools," says Arnold Longboy, director of corporate relations and recruitment, at the European campus of the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business.
"Each list relies on a unique set of judging criteria. This often results in variations in a school's ranking from list to list -leading to confusion."
Accreditation is another point of differentiation; it garners praise from most schools -particularly those with the sought-after triple accreditation. Standards assurance comes in three main flavours: AMBA (Association of MBAs), EQUIS (European Quality Improvement System) and AACSB. Each has a different approach.
Ask Robert Owen, manager of accreditation service at London-based AMBA, what goes into its process and he reels off a list of factors, including quality processes, management resources, the standard of faculty, admissions criteria, curriculum, contact time and assessment.
For EQUIS and AACSB it is a similar story with a slightly different emphasis. For example, the AACSB emphasises assuring the quality of faculty and continuous improvement.
Ian Turner, director of programmes at Henley Management College, is a fan of accreditation: "It involves a thorough process of peer review. It is a more rigorous measure of institutional programme quality than whether you go up or down in the rankings."
But a visit to the school is essential advises Narendra Laljani, director of qualification programmes at Ashridge Business School, says: "It gives participants a chance to know whether they feel comfortable. It is all about personal fit."
(c) Times Newspapers Ltd, 2006
二十之 前的
前七不動如山
十名左右的如UCLA. NYU進步很多
但坦白說
還是Business Week的較有參考性[/quote]
ranking is subjective judgement. it'd be unfair to say a ranking from certain institute is more discriminating, and the other is less convincing. undoubtedly, people tend to use rankings as one of criteria to select schools. attached a feature from "The Times" for your reference.
----------------------------------------------
Rankings in danger of being outranked;MBA
Steve Coomber
19 January 2006
The Times
Focus Report 11
English
(c) 2006 Times Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved
Steve Coomber examines an MBA love-hate relationship.
EACH year business schools nervously await the announcement of yet another ranking. But with some schools -such as Harvard -not co-operating with certain rankings and with more of them every year, are they really useful to prospective students or are there better sources of information?
Management education is a rapidly expanding market. "In the late Eighties we had about 3,000 business schools worldwide, now it's over 9,000," says John Fernandes, chief executive officer of the accreditation body AACSB (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business), based in America.
"The proliferation of schools and programmes, particularly at MBA level, makes it difficult for students and clients to differentiate high-quality schools from those of doubtful value," says Michael Osbaldeston, director of Cranfield School of Management.
For prospective MBA students two of the most visible differentiators are business-school rankings and accreditation.Once it was just Business Week's biennial survey, now US News & World Report, the Financial Times, Forbes magazine, The Wall Street Journal and the Economist Intelligence Unit have all entered the rankings fray with confusing results.
Many business schools have a love-hate relationship with the rankings. Deans care about where their school appears, but protest that the rankings do not always reflect the true quality picture, and that servicing them takes up valuable time and resources.
"MBA rankings are a good tool for someone beginning the process of evaluating schools," says Arnold Longboy, director of corporate relations and recruitment, at the European campus of the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business.
"Each list relies on a unique set of judging criteria. This often results in variations in a school's ranking from list to list -leading to confusion."
Accreditation is another point of differentiation; it garners praise from most schools -particularly those with the sought-after triple accreditation. Standards assurance comes in three main flavours: AMBA (Association of MBAs), EQUIS (European Quality Improvement System) and AACSB. Each has a different approach.
Ask Robert Owen, manager of accreditation service at London-based AMBA, what goes into its process and he reels off a list of factors, including quality processes, management resources, the standard of faculty, admissions criteria, curriculum, contact time and assessment.
For EQUIS and AACSB it is a similar story with a slightly different emphasis. For example, the AACSB emphasises assuring the quality of faculty and continuous improvement.
Ian Turner, director of programmes at Henley Management College, is a fan of accreditation: "It involves a thorough process of peer review. It is a more rigorous measure of institutional programme quality than whether you go up or down in the rankings."
But a visit to the school is essential advises Narendra Laljani, director of qualification programmes at Ashridge Business School, says: "It gives participants a chance to know whether they feel comfortable. It is all about personal fit."
(c) Times Newspapers Ltd, 2006
- peasant
- 新手會員
- 文章: 4
- 註冊時間: 2005-11-20 17:49
由 Steve Hsieh » 2006-03-29 17:03
我今天逛誠品也看到了! NT460超貴 我想今年我應該不用買了 所以今年的 data應該是2005 enrollment data.
Ranking below the top 50 要上 usenews.com 付費才給你看! 不過不需要 因為南陽街廣告會有 But! 不要太相信排名音因為那些代辦公司給的不見得正確
就像 UT-Dallas 其實並沒那麼好 我並非否定錄取 Professional MBA不優秀 只要能上自己心儀的都是優秀的 只是我老覺的南陽的會誤導申請人 找適合自己的program 最好
Ranking below the top 50 要上 usenews.com 付費才給你看! 不過不需要 因為南陽街廣告會有 But! 不要太相信排名音因為那些代辦公司給的不見得正確
就像 UT-Dallas 其實並沒那麼好 我並非否定錄取 Professional MBA不優秀 只要能上自己心儀的都是優秀的 只是我老覺的南陽的會誤導申請人 找適合自己的program 最好
- Steve Hsieh
- 初級會員
- 文章: 34
- 註冊時間: 2005-11-22 14:06
由 Allenr » 2006-03-29 17:16
agk99 \$m[1]:二十後的我沒印象
二十之 前的
前七不動如山
十名左右的如UCLA. NYU進步很多
但坦白說
還是Business Week的較有參考性
前五沒動，六七一向不穩，請參考去年排行:
6. Dartmouth College (Tuck) (NH)
6. University of California–Berkeley (Haas)
8. University of Chicago
9. Columbia University (NY)
US NEWS的排行我覺得相當能反應一般老美心中對"the university as a whole" 的感想，因此若想要了解學校的prestige，這是個滿不錯的指標，除此之外，沒甚麼參考價值。
--------------------------------------------------
采薇采薇，薇亦作止。曰歸曰歸，歲亦莫止。
靡室靡家，學貸之故。不遑啟居，學貸之故!
采薇采薇，薇亦作止。曰歸曰歸，歲亦莫止。
靡室靡家，學貸之故。不遑啟居，學貸之故!
-
Allenr - 中級會員
- 文章: 288
- 註冊時間: 2005-01-28 22:40
- 來自: TW
58 篇文章 • 第 2 頁 (共 4 頁) • 1，2，3，4
誰在線上
正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者：沒有註冊會員 和 28 位訪客
Copyright © 2006-2009 FormosaMBA.com. All Rights Reserved.
