大全987- Q25

[sweetymanman]

25. A recent study of ancient clay deposits has provided new evidence supporting the theory of global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact thatcontributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs and many other creatures some 65 million years ago.
(A) supporting the theory of global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact that
(B) supporting the theory that global forest fires ignited by a meteorite impact
(C) that supports the theory of global forest fires that were ignited by a meteorite impact and that
(D) in support of the theory that global forest fires were ignited by a meteorite impact and that
(E) of support for the theory of a meteorite impact that ignited global forest fires and

answer :B
可以請慶問各位大大為什麼答案是B嗎？

[td91]

(A) 一個彗星毀掉恐龍而引發全球森林大火的理論，變成句意在講大火.....原來evidence是大火.....很怪的句意，應該是指這個theory怎麼說明恐龍如何滅絕才是這題想表示的句意吧，而且毀掉恐龍的是大火，不是impact，那個that擺的不太對

(B) 對了，用that清楚說明這個theory: 彗星撞地球，引發森林大火，大火燒光恐龍

(C) 哇..三個that,that 不完，不簡潔，且句意也注重在大火

(D)and that變成theory毀掉恐龍

(E) of support for不如用動詞清楚，且contributed對應has provided變成study毀掉恐龍

給你參考一下，錯了麻煩指正一下，謝謝...

[Philosophia]

這段停機期間，這題看很久都沒看出來，還是傷咖最好了～


這題用了好幾個分詞

evidence 在 OG 中大抵接 of or that，或許這是因為要說明theory，所以改用participle

不過 (D), evidence 不接 in, 且二個 that 用 and 連接, 有了平衡, 卻失了句意


這陣子作題，發現單是平衡就可以去好幾個選項了