我想請問一下為什麼B對 B不是已經犯了主動詞不一致的毛病了嗎??

版主: shpassion, Traver0818
stwang \$m[1]:通常the N. of N. V. ... 動詞要跟前面的那個N
majority 算是個例外囉?!
我這樣的想法對嗎???
請各位指點一下唷!! 謝謝
chvenson \$m[1]:a group of + N + 單數動詞
請參考OG238的解釋
Choice A is best. The singular verb has agrees with the subject of the clause, the number. Moreover, A conveys the intended meaning concisely and unambiguously. In B, the grammatical subject of the clause is the number, not women, and so a singular verb is required--has rather than have. The phrase who are is unnecessary; it could be omitted without affecting the meaning of the sentence. In C, the use of the wordy passive construction there has been growth in for has grown is awkward and does not contribute to the meaning of the sentence. In D, a... number of women means a group of women, whereas the... number of women refers to an exact figure; the illogical suggestion is that a group of women has already been in place in every election, rather than that their total has grown as a result of each election. Choice E may be faulted for the awkwardness of in number in state legislatures in every election, as well as for weakening clarity by separating the modifying phrase in state legislatures from women.
scujean \$m[1]:
在longman,oxford字典看到的例句:
A group of us are going to London.
A group of us are going to the theatre this evening.
我搞不清楚了..
回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區
正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 9 位訪客