想請問一下作文在Criterion與正式考試的問題!!
我目前在criterion練習的作文不是5分就是6分.
句子結構也都不用甚麼困難 的句子.我也發現文法及字的用法正確
與否是整篇作文的5分提升到6分關鍵!!
正式的考試也是依樣畫葫廬地去做就可以了嗎?
作文在Criterion與正式考試的評分是否一致
版主: micki, miaoidio, marchmarch, spritee
11 篇帖子 • 分页： 1 / 1
Re: 作文在Criterion與正式考試的評分是否一致
由 maloney » 2006-05-09 20:17
答案是否定的，現在CBT TWE由criterion評分後，再由人工閱卷老師評分。兩個評分的分數去平均才是你的分數。
一般來說criterion是由字數，文法和重覆用字多少來評分。
但是實際能知道你的essay develop好不好是由人工閱卷老師決定。
整篇寫離題，但是criterion評滿分，最後老師打很低分的話，會再由另一個老師來改你的TWE以確保沒主觀人為因素讓考生分數降低。
所以一般來說criterion滿分也不代表什麼，只代表你的local structure在grammar方面處理好而已。根據ETS TWE評分最重要因素是address the topic task，這部份是屬於global structure，占比分非常重，而這部份成績是由人工閱卷老師給的分數。
所以你也要注意一下你的內容是否develop夠和是否回答題目問題，這樣才可能拿到5分或6分。
一般來說criterion是由字數，文法和重覆用字多少來評分。
但是實際能知道你的essay develop好不好是由人工閱卷老師決定。
整篇寫離題，但是criterion評滿分，最後老師打很低分的話，會再由另一個老師來改你的TWE以確保沒主觀人為因素讓考生分數降低。
所以一般來說criterion滿分也不代表什麼，只代表你的local structure在grammar方面處理好而已。根據ETS TWE評分最重要因素是address the topic task，這部份是屬於global structure，占比分非常重，而這部份成績是由人工閱卷老師給的分數。
所以你也要注意一下你的內容是否develop夠和是否回答題目問題，這樣才可能拿到5分或6分。
- maloney
- 中級會員
- 帖子: 253
- 注册: 2006-03-24 13:26
由 maloney » 2006-05-10 08:16
應該不是喔!
criterion軟體已經有說明無法判别主題了，去美加買時，他們也會這樣告訴你。
有時讀不出來可能是軟體問題，因為criterion只給好像5題練習的樣子，事實上誰真的只會練習五題，好像會把寫過的essay都貼上去試試看。
因為我只有GRE的criterion，所以就用GRE的criterion中的issue去試，argument就不行。
事實上我還覺得criterion有問題是我把連標題都貼上去，criterion竟然將標題當做主題句，所以我才會覺得criterion蠻笨的。
criterion軟體已經有說明無法判别主題了，去美加買時，他們也會這樣告訴你。
有時讀不出來可能是軟體問題，因為criterion只給好像5題練習的樣子，事實上誰真的只會練習五題，好像會把寫過的essay都貼上去試試看。
因為我只有GRE的criterion，所以就用GRE的criterion中的issue去試，argument就不行。
事實上我還覺得criterion有問題是我把連標題都貼上去，criterion竟然將標題當做主題句，所以我才會覺得criterion蠻笨的。
franksklu \$m[1]:感謝解說!!!
因為Criterion也有能力判斷題目是否離題的能力!!
我post一篇跟題目完全無關的文章上去,結果Criterion
無法評分,因為軟體指出,我的文章離題!!!所以我才會覺得
Criterion的評估功能不只評字數及文法而已!!
- maloney
- 中級會員
- 帖子: 253
- 注册: 2006-03-24 13:26
Re: 作文在Criterion與正式考試的評分是否一致
由 MichelleHsu » 2006-05-11 16:57
今天抓了一篇2005年新版托福作文範文丟到Criterion上測, 居然得分N/A.
題目是It has been said, "Not everything that is learned is contained in books." Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why? (編號4的題目)
範文內容如下:
Both experiences and books are very essential resources, and both of them have relevant merits.
Experiences are the most direct resources we ever have. Almost our every basic skill came from experiences, such as walking, articulating, reading even thinking. Without experiences, some natural born abilities even might lose. Studies have shown that a baby who was robbed by animals into forest for 12 years lost his ability to talk in human language. Furthermore, it is generally accepted that each and every skill develops by experiences, and that's why people always say practice makes perfect.
Books are valuable when knowledge is beyond the scope of our experiences. Perhaps the most obvious examples are those fluent writers. They write various stories, the scopes of which are far beyond any individual's experiences. Take Joyce Carol Oates for example, her productivity has been prodigious, accumulating in less than two decades to nearly thirty titles, including novels, collections of short stories and verse, plays and literary criticism. Although some of them appear to come from her own direct observations, her dreams, and her fears, much more is clearly from the experiences of others. Her fictive world remains strikingly akin to that real one reflected in the daily newspapers, the television news and talk shows, and the popular magazines of our day.
Yet either experiences or books may give us wrong information. Our direct observations always are subject to our beliefs, hopes, fears, expectations, and our bias, which might make observations unreliable. People vary in their powers of observation, and the reliability of our observations is no better than the reliability of our memories, which as we know can be deceptive. Information printed in papers sometimes is unreliable either, it may be misprinted, or even deliberately distorted. For example, Definitions such as Marxism, Capitalism, Zionism are totally different in the Oxford Learner's Dictionary of Current English between the original edition and the sanctioned Russian edition.
In conclusion, both sources are important. Sometimes one is more important than the other in accordance with specific circumstances. For example, when we make a general survey about a certain subject, we may prefer rich references in library. On the other hand, if we want to know more specific details, we had better refer to experiences such as results of carefully designed experiments.
是範文寫得不好還是程式有問題呢? 一直以為範文都是得分6的指標性文章.. 存疑中.
ps. criterion一次可以練習的文章是12篇.
題目是It has been said, "Not everything that is learned is contained in books." Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why? (編號4的題目)
範文內容如下:
Both experiences and books are very essential resources, and both of them have relevant merits.
Experiences are the most direct resources we ever have. Almost our every basic skill came from experiences, such as walking, articulating, reading even thinking. Without experiences, some natural born abilities even might lose. Studies have shown that a baby who was robbed by animals into forest for 12 years lost his ability to talk in human language. Furthermore, it is generally accepted that each and every skill develops by experiences, and that's why people always say practice makes perfect.
Books are valuable when knowledge is beyond the scope of our experiences. Perhaps the most obvious examples are those fluent writers. They write various stories, the scopes of which are far beyond any individual's experiences. Take Joyce Carol Oates for example, her productivity has been prodigious, accumulating in less than two decades to nearly thirty titles, including novels, collections of short stories and verse, plays and literary criticism. Although some of them appear to come from her own direct observations, her dreams, and her fears, much more is clearly from the experiences of others. Her fictive world remains strikingly akin to that real one reflected in the daily newspapers, the television news and talk shows, and the popular magazines of our day.
Yet either experiences or books may give us wrong information. Our direct observations always are subject to our beliefs, hopes, fears, expectations, and our bias, which might make observations unreliable. People vary in their powers of observation, and the reliability of our observations is no better than the reliability of our memories, which as we know can be deceptive. Information printed in papers sometimes is unreliable either, it may be misprinted, or even deliberately distorted. For example, Definitions such as Marxism, Capitalism, Zionism are totally different in the Oxford Learner's Dictionary of Current English between the original edition and the sanctioned Russian edition.
In conclusion, both sources are important. Sometimes one is more important than the other in accordance with specific circumstances. For example, when we make a general survey about a certain subject, we may prefer rich references in library. On the other hand, if we want to know more specific details, we had better refer to experiences such as results of carefully designed experiments.
是範文寫得不好還是程式有問題呢? 一直以為範文都是得分6的指標性文章.. 存疑中.
ps. criterion一次可以練習的文章是12篇.
- MichelleHsu
- 新手會員
- 帖子: 13
- 注册: 2006-05-06 09:55
Re: 作文在Criterion與正式考試的評分是否一致
由 dennis115316 » 2006-05-12 06:22
maloney \$m[1]:答案是否定的，現在CBT TWE由criterion評分後，再由人工閱卷老師評分。兩個評分的分數去平均才是你的分數。
一般來說criterion是由字數，文法和重覆用字多少來評分。
但是實際能知道你的essay develop好不好是由人工閱卷老師決定。
整篇寫離題，但是criterion評滿分，最後老師打很低分的話，會再由另一個老師來改你的TWE以確保沒主觀人為因素讓考生分數降低。
所以一般來說criterion滿分也不代表什麼，只代表你的local structure在grammar方面處理好而已。根據ETS TWE評分最重要因素是address the topic task，這部份是屬於global structure，占比分非常重，而這部份成績是由人工閱卷老師給的分數。
所以你也要注意一下你的內容是否develop夠和是否回答題目問題，這樣才可能拿到5分或6分。
我百分百同意這個論點，就算是crterion拿滿分也不代表什麼，重點是練習寫作最好是老師改才是最好的，又能知道你的文法及觀點是不是正確，crterion只是能練習你的文章結構及速度。而且最重要的是以後當你進了研究所後，就知道寫作的重要性了，所以還是要打好基礎。 ~~~有著深深的體會
- dennis115316
- 新手會員
- 帖子: 15
- 注册: 2005-10-08 10:51
由 MichelleHsu » 2006-05-15 23:50
我用的帳號是去美加買的, 因為之前不知道有這個網站, NT999換來的帳號是12篇沒錯. 可能是每一期題目數不同或是有其他購買管道, 這就不清楚了.
csl \$m[1]:To MichelleHsu大:
可練習的題目確定是12篇嗎??
爲何我用網站提供的帳號上去看只有6篇呢??
是我搞錯了嗎??
謝謝!!
- MichelleHsu
- 新手會員
- 帖子: 13
- 注册: 2006-05-06 09:55
11 篇帖子 • 分页： 1 / 1
在线用户
正在浏览此版面的用户：没有注册用户 和 9 位游客
Copyright © 2006-2009 FormosaMBA.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
• 简体中文语系由 PHPBB中文翻译小组 维护制作
