[問題]大全10-Q20

[angelat]

10-20. In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for
safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize
injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of
injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.

答案是D
為什麼不選A呢
A直接說歐洲人比較可能帶安全帶不是就支持了上文美國要加強帶安全帶的說法
能否幫忙解說
謝謝

[StanleyHuang]

它的結論是說，要美國採用更高的標準來設計安全帶，而不是說要加強綁安全帶。

也就是說，歐洲人比較可能綁安全帶 -> 美國人比較不綁安全帶 -> 出事情可能跟不綁安全帶有關，未必跟安全帶的設計有關 -> weaken the argument