[問題]OG(11th)67

[Emilyh]

67.Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested,but in attributiing criminal or deliquent behavior to some food allergy,the perpetrators are in affect told that they are not responsible for their actions.


OG解釋:in attributiing criminal or deliquent behavior to some food allergy是修飾perpetrators而不是attorneys，所以是錯的。
請問要如何判斷這句話是修飾誰?

謝謝