[問題]GWD21-10

[coulomb]

Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

A.it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who

B.it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors

C.appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors

D.appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors

E.appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who

這題答案D
看到what我就傻眼了 , 就算帶入the thing which也還是看不懂是什麼意思
請問這邊的what用which代意思有什麼不一樣呢？

[giraffe]

personal idea.

1. 比較選項, AB有it,其他人無
2. what要當受詞也要當主詞 -> AB刪
3. C: and 前後不平衡 ->刪
4. E: it 無人可代 -> 刪
5. 把D帶入check -> 可!
6. 下一題.

[chour]

我這題是用兩個慣用語解的~
1.evidence + that S.+V. ---->殺A,E
2.appears +to +V.
或者apears +that S. +V.---->再殺A,B,C

[Jen-Cheng]

have unearthed..from "the location which" appears to be an ，
the location which = the thing which=what ，就是因為location不知為何，只知似乎是怎樣的一個地方..，如果用 "the location"感覺是多餘的字，再說 spears from "which" come..應該是接著說來自那裡
而不是from which appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground，變成說spears 似乎是一個古老的地方。所以不能用 "which" 來 replace "what".
個人小小的看法

[hccill]

想請問一下各位大大~

如果我把D帶入題目中:
Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors
systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

=>其中have unearthed是動詞1,這個我可以了解,但是解下來的stunning呢?

我的想法是有可能是",ving"表伴隨狀態的結構,但問題是,stun這個字用主動實在很怪,變成是"researchers去嚇evidence",我想句意應該是"researchers被evidence嚇到了",所以我想請問,在這用"stunning evidence"有什麼特別涵義或功能嗎?為什麼不是"stunned by evidence"呢?

還請各位大大幫幫忙~
感謝感謝~

[yellowten]

想請問一下各位大大~

如果我把D帶入題目中:
Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors
systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

=>其中have unearthed是動詞1,這個我可以了解,但是解下來的stunning呢?

我的想法是有可能是",ving"表伴隨狀態的結構,但問題是,stun這個字用主動實在很怪,變成是"researchers去嚇evidence",我想句意應該是"researchers被evidence嚇到了",所以我想請問,在這用"stunning evidence"有什麼特別涵義或功能嗎?為什麼不是"stunned by evidence"呢?

還請各位大大幫幫忙~
感謝感謝~

呵呵 我不是高手啦
但是我覺得這是同位語耶~
stunning evidence
在這邊stunning是當作形容詞來看 修飾evidence

stunning evidence (that human ancestors
systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.)

that 後面帶出是"什麼"證據
名詞子句

這樣子解釋是不是就比較通了呢?
參考看看囉

[hccill]

喔~還挺有道理的耶~

那麼說來stunning evidence就是和400,000-year-old wooden spears同位囉~

是降子沒錯吧!?

謝謝你囉~