GWD11-37

[fsab00037748]

這篇的第一段有幾個that帶出一長串的東西,
看得有點小糊,想請問大家,我這樣的理解是不是對的?
謝謝喔 麻煩了


1.
Recent feminist scholarship con-
cerning the United States in the 1920’s
challenges earlier interpretations that
Line assessed the twenties in terms of the
(5) unkept “promises” of the women’s
suffrage movement.

是說這些feminist challenges之前的interpretation,然後assess the twenties.....嗎?

2.
This new scholar-
ship disputes the long-held view that
because a women’s voting bloc did not
materialize after women gained the right
(10) to vote in 1920, suffrage failed to
produce long-term political gains for
women.

這邊的意思是說 new scholarship不認為"suffrage失敗的原因是women's voting bloc," 並引申出suffrage失敗的原因其實是suffrage自己嗎?


3. These feminist scholars also
challenge the old view that pronounced
suffrage a failure for not delivering on
(15) the promise that the women’s vote
would bring about moral, corruption-
free governance.

這句話 大概又是怎麼解釋呢?

[hcgh]

這篇的第一段有幾個that帶出一長串的東西,
看得有點小糊,想請問大家,我這樣的理解是不是對的?
謝謝喔 麻煩了


1.
Recent feminist scholarship con-
cerning the United States in the 1920’s
challenges earlier interpretations that
Line assessed the twenties in terms of the
(5) unkept “promises” of the women’s
suffrage movement.

是說這些feminist challenges之前的interpretation,然後assess the twenties.....嗎?

hcgh: that assess...是形容詞子句，修飾 interpretations.
這些feminist challenges之前的interpretation, 這個interpretation assess the ...

2.
This new scholar-
ship disputes the long-held view that
because a women’s voting bloc did not
materialize after women gained the right
(10) to vote in 1920, suffrage failed to
produce long-term political gains for
women.

這邊的意思是說 new scholarship不認為"suffrage失敗的原因是women's voting bloc," 並引申出suffrage失敗的原因其實是suffrage自己嗎?

hcgh: that引導同位語名詞子句，這個名詞子句從because開始，一直到12行的第一個字woman.
new scholarship反對 "因為..., 所以..." 這件事

3. These feminist scholars also
challenge the old view that pronounced
suffrage a failure for not delivering on
(15) the promise that the women’s vote
would bring about moral, corruption-
free governance.

這句話 大概又是怎麼解釋呢?

hcgh: 學者不認同舊觀點, 這個舊觀點認為suffrage是失敗的，因為suffrage沒有實現原本的承諾，什麼承諾？the women’s vote
would bring about moral, corruption-
free governance.

[nexxt0722]

文章脈絡大抵是:

第一段
新學者不認為1920年代的"女性公民權運動"落敗,就算有,也是因為全體公民權的落敗所致

第二段
但新學者不得不承認1920年代的"女權運動"確實衰敗了...

第三段
作者認為1920年代的女權並沒有新學者說的那麼糟,還是有所進展的!

[pimi]

針對Q36 大家可以從lost以及few看到作者表態, 但是我覺得有點是看了答案後去反推的感覺耶~ 因為當初我看到的是lines 30中的 "little" could be seen in the way of legislative victories中的little 以至於選擇了答案D

有沒有大大可以幫助我離清我的觀念阿
這個閱讀是我第二次做到了
但是還是錯的一蹋糊塗

[pimi]

不好意思
我想通了
我來自問自答好了

基本上
"lost" its cohesiveness,
"little" could be seen in the way of legislative victories
都只是用來形容"few" successes的原因
所以用"few"去看作者態度, 而選了C
如果以lost 或是little去看作者態度, 那就太細項了