GWD12-30

由 **liwuu** » 2004-12-20 00:34

Q30:According to public health officials, in 1998 Massachusetts became the first state in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than under it.

A.than
B.than born
C.than they were
D.than there had been
E.than had been born

這一題答案為A...說實在五個答案大概也只有這個比較合理!!不過我想問一下,這樣會不會造成baby under the age of thirty的誤解?!

由 **homaru** » 2004-12-20 02:11

than (babies were born to women) under it (it指the age of thirty)
(babies were born to women)省略
對吧....?

由 **liwuu** » 2004-12-20 09:51

homaru \$m[1]:than (babies were born to women) under it (it指the age of thirty)
(babies were born to women)省略
對吧....?

完全同意,還原後應該是這樣...
我是想說如果寫成 than those(指babies) were born to women under it會不會比較好...還是不需要呢?!

由 **josephko** » 2004-12-20 11:46

比較的話,主謂相同時,省略比較簡潔喔

由訪客 » 2004-12-21 16:26

前面記的有討論比較級的省略原則
介係詞片語比較,如主動詞一樣,可省略主動詞

由 **CUGGYER** » 2005-09-17 11:01

請問C they 我承認他ambiguity (不確定代 women or babies)

但是 A 不會有 babies under the age of 30的怪異嗎><

覺得很怪異.....

由 **hplin** » 2005-12-08 21:10

我也有同樣問題

再推一次

由 **mandy-lo** » 2007-05-27 12:56

GWD12-30

CUGGYER大大
請問C they 我承認他ambiguity (不確定代 women or babies)

但是 A 不會有 babies under the age of 30的怪異嗎><

覺得很怪異.....

hplin大大
我也有同樣問題
再推一次

樓上的homaru大大，己經清楚的還原整句，所以這個地方不會有babies under the age of 30的怪異的情況出現哦！
我想請教一下這裡若使用than those were born to women under it或者than were born to women under it
我記得GWD有好幾題出現過這種省略的問題…，想請教一下各位好心的大大哪個較好還是都可以???????????????

由 **dibert8** » 2007-06-09 15:00

相同的字理論上都可以省略
(A) 省略的是 babies were born to women, 如果必須用 those, 不同字是不能省略的,但是 those 要指誰 (women? babies?)
所以要省就全部省略,才清楚喔!

GWD12-30

GWD12-30

誰在線上