Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 查看主题 - 大全section1,7

大全section1,7

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

大全section1,7

帖子stwang » 2005-10-14 18:15

7.Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from being pirated. With that protection, manufacturers would be encouraged to invest in the development of new products and technologies. Such investment frequently results in an increase in a manufacturer’s productivity.
Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?
(A) Stronger patent laws tend to benefit financial institutions as well as manufacturers.
(B) Increased productivity in manufacturing is likely to be accompanied by the creation of more manufacturing jobs.
(C) Manufacturers will decrease investment in the development of new products and technologies unless there are stronger patent laws.
(D) The weakness of current patent laws has been a cause of economic recession.
(E) Stronger patent laws would stimulate improvements in productivity for many manufacturers.

ANS:E
我想請問 為什麼(B)錯呢???
我的想法是:
Protection is used→ manufacturers invest in the development of new products and technologies→ manufacturers’ productivities increase
那生產力的增加不是因為許多manufacturing jobs的創造嗎??
*-) 麻煩各位大大幫忙唷 :laugh
stwang
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 65
注册: 2005-01-14 17:08

Re: 大全section1,7

帖子林小馬 » 2005-10-15 09:54

stwang \$m[1]:7.Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from being pirated. With that protection, manufacturers would be encouraged to invest in the development of new products and technologies. Such investment frequently results in an increase in a manufacturer’s productivity.
Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?

(B) Increased productivity in manufacturing is likely to be accompanied by the creation of more manufacturing jobs.
(E) Stronger patent laws would stimulate improvements in productivity for many manufacturers.

ANS:E
我想請問 為什麼(B)錯呢???
我的想法是:
Protection is used→ manufacturers invest in the development of new products and technologies→ manufacturers’ productivities increase
那生產力的增加不是因為許多manufacturing jobs的創造嗎??
*-) 麻煩各位大大幫忙唷 :laugh


我想你對E沒有疑問吧,只是想問為什麼不能選B
我個人認為B有點過度推理
題目只有說提升productivity, 選項卻說創造了更多jobs
提生生產力不代表一定是有增加jobs啊
就像題目說的,保護專利權,廠商就願意多投資在技術的創新和發展
那很可能是技術進步和突破,
而在完全沒有增加人手和工作機會的情況下,提生生產力啊
供你參考囉!
林小馬
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 367
注册: 2005-08-23 20:58
地址: Taiwan

帖子stwang » 2005-10-15 17:30

嗯嗯 我本來是選B 之後看E也覺得這選項不錯
就是不知道B和E如何抉擇 經過您的解析 我大致瞭解了

果然conclusion題 不能太用主觀意識去選答案
要看到題目寫什麼 在仔細的推結論 切記切記!! ;-$

謝謝您的解答唷 感激不盡!!!! :laugh
stwang
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 65
注册: 2005-01-14 17:08

帖子aerobert » 2006-12-06 16:58

那這題的C,可以看成負負得正的觀念嗎?
C答案我的想法是:如果沒有保護專利權廠商就為減少投資在發展新技術跟產品
aerobert
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 46
注册: 2006-04-25 08:40
地址: 台南

帖子dibert8 » 2007-04-13 12:47

patent laws --> investment --> productivity
=> patent laws --> productivity
=> (E)

(C) patent laws --> investment 只推了一半就停了.
題目沒提,不要想太多 (套SC技巧:被動少選 i.e. 不直接); 以閱讀來做題,題目的用字都是正面字眼,負面字眼的選項就可以刪除了.
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
帖子: 2202
注册: 2007-01-08 01:17


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

在线用户

正在浏览此版面的用户:没有注册用户 和 6 位游客