Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - GWD-18-Q3-Q5

GWD-18-Q3-Q5

GMAT 考的是閱讀....閱讀....還是閱讀....

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

GWD-18-Q3-Q5

文章elsachang » 2006-12-19 16:13

GWD-18-Q3-Q5

The idea that equipping homes
with electrical appliances and other
“modern” household technologies
Line would eliminate drudgery, save labor
(5) time, and increase leisure for women
who were full-time home workers
remained largely unchallenged until
the women’s movement of the 1970’s
spawned the groundbreaking and
(10) influential works of sociologist Joann
Vanek and historian Ruth Cowan.
Vanek analyzed 40 years of time-
use surveys conducted by home
economists to argue that electrical
(15) appliances and other modern house-
hold technologies reduced the effort
required to perform specific tasks,
but ownership of these appliances did
not correlate with less time spent on
(20) housework by full-time home workers.
In fact, time spent by these workers
remained remarkably constant―at
about 52 to 54 hours per week―from
the 1920’s to the 1960’s, a period
(25) of significant change in household
technology. In surveying two
centuries of household technology
in the United States, Cowan argued
that the “industrialization” of the home
(30) often resulted in more work for full-time
home workers because the use of
such devices as coal stoves, water
pumps, and vacuum cleaners tended
to reduce the workload of married-
(35) women’s helpers (husbands, sons,
daughters, and servants) while
promoting a more rigorous standard
of housework. The full-time home
worker’s duties also shifted to include
(40) more household management, child
care, and the post-Second World War
phenomenon of being “Mom’s taxi.”


Q4:
The passage is primarily concerned with

A. analyzing a debate between two scholars
B. challenging the evidence on which a new theory is based
C. describing how certain scholars’ work countered a prevailing view
D. presenting the research used to support a traditional theory
E. evaluating the methodology used to study a particular issue

這一題我選 C, 但答案給 A
我覺得很怪, 因為 Vanek 和 Cowan 兩人都是提出electrical appliances 並沒有減少家庭主婦做家事的時間, 那麼他們兩人之間怎麼會有debate呢?



Q5.
Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 21-26 (“In fact, time … in household technology”)?

A. It offers an alternative interpretation of a phenomenon described in the previous sentence (lines 12-20).
B. It provides the specific evidence on which an argument described in the previous sentence (lines 12-20) is based.
C. It shifts the focus of the argument developed earlier in the passage.
D. It introduces evidence that has not been taken into account by Vanek and Cowan.
E. It introduces a topic for discussion that will be developed in the rest of the passage.

這一題我選B, 但答案給C
我不懂C選項中的shifts the focus of the argument 從何看出...?


以上兩題, 請大家給我一點思考的方向, thanks a lot !
elsachang
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 6
註冊時間: 2006-05-09 21:24

文章hwatai » 2006-12-19 23:46

這兩題我也作答C與B
我不覺得我們有做錯
會不會是答案出問題了?
hwatai
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 247
註冊時間: 2005-02-19 16:22
來自: 牛棚

文章A級垂耳兔 » 2007-01-18 23:08

別懷疑自己...我的答案和你們一樣...
非常確定答案就是如你們所說....
頭像
A級垂耳兔
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 451
註冊時間: 2006-09-04 17:47
來自: 台北市


回到 GMAT Reading Comprehension 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 14 位訪客