Situation:
I was admitted to UCLA in R1 while working on my R2 application for Yale and NYU. Now I really need to do an internal ranking among these three schools because there is no point continuing with my R2 application, flying to U.S. from Asia for interviews, if UCLA is my first choice. Yet, I am having a hard time letting the other two schools go for the advantages I might benefit from attending there.
Long term aspiration is to do investment managment in Greater China region.
What do you guys think? Why? Current students' inputs are very welcomed.
UCLA
Pros:
Great weather of Southern California
Top school in the second biggest metropolitan city
Better ranked and great reputation in Asia
Many Asians, good for my long-term goal to do IM in the Greater China region
The school culture is very collegial and students are great to talk to
Decent facility
Cons:
Not as finance focused as Yale- Student placements are scattered among finance, consulting, and marketing
Not as many Investment Management (IM) electives that intrigue me
Yale
Pros:
Great overall brand - Access to Yale club around the globe
Awesome IM-related electives- value investing, endowment management, behavioral finance...etc
High % of students is placed in financial service function upon graduation and supposedly strong in buy-side IM
I like the idea behind the new core curriculum
I’m inspired by Yale’s aspiration to become one of the top bschool with dramatic changes in the near future- new building, new curriculum
Cons:
New Haven…
Small student body = small SOM alumni base
I was told that the facility is not very good
NYU
Pros:
It’s in New York with great Wall Street connection; I also love the city
Strength in finance
Students are very down to earth and easy to talk to
Electives are not as IM-focused as Yale
Cons:
Overall reputation is not as well respected as the other two
Cold weather in winter…